More tour details in the sun
[www.thesun.co.uk]

Please, stop this.
ablett, you were to hurried up; see below.
Seems like what´s in the Sun is as heavy as
stuff in "Mad" or something.

A gig at 5th of August should be quite wellknown at this point
on this forum and other similiar sites.

August 05, as in August 2005. Not necessarily the 5th of the month.

ablett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> More tour details in the sun
>
>


theres no tour details there at all other than "the Stones are going to tour". Its not even a story, as every paper including this one have been saying for months the Stones will tour in 2005.

The only thing that silly bitch is confirming is that the Stones collective age is 242 years old.

Three years ago her predecessor ran a story with a headline "Stones to tour at 230". They're even recycling headlines now. Obviously a slow news day in the showbiz columns

Baboon Bro, thanks for stating the bloomin obvious!! I thought it would be interesting to keep everyone up with the latest articles....beats wittering on about vibratos or RW v MT!!!!

LOL

Tell it like it is ablett haha

Right ablett; as you see I was ro rushy miself: August 05 means August 2005 as erikjjf points out above; see also above Gazza on recycle methods among "journalists"

I think we must be careful with what articles we post; many people here are new at the forum and might not be able to evaluate & sort things out.

Not even JKF posts The Sun-articles anymore... The worst is that evening papers all over the world are attaching these low levels...

I'll try not to 'rushy miself' then eh!
How can you criticise a fine institution like the Sun...why you only have to look at the informative front page headline to see how concise it can be.
And what did JFK do to upset ya?
Anyway, I'm sure even beginners dont really need to 'evaluate' these newspaper reports....but it sure beats trying to guess which Sinatra song the aint gonna do!!

Kent is my rock 'n' roll friend & soul brother from Denmark.
but also a youngster with - at times - a little too much eagerness to quote shite-articles like this in question.
Still I think its either a matter of bad sense of hunour to wuote even without marks, like "tour confirmed...". Ok, you mentioned The Sun: But not every Tell Me-user knows that´s toiletpaper... Only a couple of months since I realized it, mostly because of Gazza. And I´m 41 and well-educated, even a Historian that works much with newspapers.
I agree that there´s much crap along this forum esp. last week - but I still think we´re not here to upset honest Stones fans with false rumours.
A suggestion: You could use words like: The sun claims etc. when featuring such stuff.

Can you get 'false' and 'rumour'???? Anyway, who gives a toss....I just thought a few might be interested.

There is already a thread on this subject here:
"New tour confirmed on British TV"


Bjornulf