For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
stonesrule
Mick wouldn't still be performing if he didn't comprehend the various facets of the concert (as opposed to video) audience...although it would take a psychiatrist to explain the "audience" as personifed by the wide variety of "fans" posting here.
Quote
fahthree
Sitting in the Air Canada Centre last night I noticed something about "average fans", or at least that's what Mick calls them. We know that they don't want obscure numbers and like to hear the hits. No doubt I found myself sitting amongst these people last night.
During the hits that they all came to hear -- they talked. They talked non-stop. Why? -- I wondered. They always talk over them. Whether they hear them at a bar or at party. That's what they do during the hits because they know them too well. During Emotional Rescue, a song that they may or may not know, depending upon their level of "average", they listened. Maybe I'll never know if it was because they were hearing something different, or perhaps they had run out of things to say.
My point is this -- I don't believe Mick knows his fan base whatsoever. The diehards don't expect a full set of obscure stuff. They expect a few treats. Mick doesn't give the "average fan" enough credit. While he was working his ass off playing the hits he knows they want to hear, they were talking over him and, at points, flat out ignoring him.
Quote
fahthree
Sitting in the Air Canada Centre last night I noticed something about "average fans", or at least that's what Mick calls them. We know that they don't want obscure numbers and like to hear the hits. No doubt I found myself sitting amongst these people last night.
During the hits that they all came to hear -- they talked. They talked non-stop. Why? -- I wondered. They always talk over them. Whether they hear them at a bar or at party. That's what they do during the hits because they know them too well. During Emotional Rescue, a song that they may or may not know, depending upon their level of "average", they listened. Maybe I'll never know if it was because they were hearing something different, or perhaps they had run out of things to say.
My point is this -- I don't believe Mick knows his fan base whatsoever. The diehards don't expect a full set of obscure stuff. They expect a few treats. Mick doesn't give the "average fan" enough credit. While he was working his ass off playing the hits he knows they want to hear, they were talking over him and, at points, flat out ignoring him.
Quote
JumpinJackOLanternQuote
fahthree
Sitting in the Air Canada Centre last night I noticed something about "average fans", or at least that's what Mick calls them. We know that they don't want obscure numbers and like to hear the hits. No doubt I found myself sitting amongst these people last night.
During the hits that they all came to hear -- they talked. They talked non-stop. Why? -- I wondered. They always talk over them. Whether they hear them at a bar or at party. That's what they do during the hits because they know them too well. During Emotional Rescue, a song that they may or may not know, depending upon their level of "average", they listened. Maybe I'll never know if it was because they were hearing something different, or perhaps they had run out of things to say.
My point is this -- I don't believe Mick knows his fan base whatsoever. The diehards don't expect a full set of obscure stuff. They expect a few treats. Mick doesn't give the "average fan" enough credit. While he was working his ass off playing the hits he knows they want to hear, they were talking over him and, at points, flat out ignoring him.
Don't be fooled, these are actually Beatles fans that have been planted in the audience to give the impression that the Stones have become boring.
Quote
stonesrule
Mick wouldn't still be performing if he didn't comprehend the various facets of the concert (as opposed to video) audience...although it would take a psychiatrist to explain the "audience" as personifed by the wide variety of "fans" posting here.
Quote
MunichhiltonQuote
JumpinJackOLanternQuote
fahthree
Sitting in the Air Canada Centre last night I noticed something about "average fans", or at least that's what Mick calls them. We know that they don't want obscure numbers and like to hear the hits. No doubt I found myself sitting amongst these people last night.
During the hits that they all came to hear -- they talked. They talked non-stop. Why? -- I wondered. They always talk over them. Whether they hear them at a bar or at party. That's what they do during the hits because they know them too well. During Emotional Rescue, a song that they may or may not know, depending upon their level of "average", they listened. Maybe I'll never know if it was because they were hearing something different, or perhaps they had run out of things to say.
My point is this -- I don't believe Mick knows his fan base whatsoever. The diehards don't expect a full set of obscure stuff. They expect a few treats. Mick doesn't give the "average fan" enough credit. While he was working his ass off playing the hits he knows they want to hear, they were talking over him and, at points, flat out ignoring him.
Don't be fooled, these are actually Beatles fans that have been planted in the audience to give the impression that the Stones have become boring.
There's still Beatles fans? I thought we we're losing them like WWII vets?
Quote
LongBeachArena72Quote
stonesrule
Mick wouldn't still be performing if he didn't comprehend the various facets of the concert (as opposed to video) audience...although it would take a psychiatrist to explain the "audience" as personifed by the wide variety of "fans" posting here.
I'm not sure the Stones have any concept what "their audience" consists of these days. They still live in a world dominated by record labels, promoters, agents; their insulation seems bullet-proof.
Their online/soc media efforts seem pro-forma to me. The world now allows for complete disintermediation: an artist can get right up next to his/her readers/viewers/listeners, without all the organizational & bureaucratic bullshit of the past.
But its hard to imagine the Stones at this stage of their lives and career becoming that kind of band; why would they bother when they can just roll out every few years and barnstorm with warhorses?
Quote
JumpinJackOLanternQuote
LongBeachArena72Quote
stonesrule
Mick wouldn't still be performing if he didn't comprehend the various facets of the concert (as opposed to video) audience...although it would take a psychiatrist to explain the "audience" as personifed by the wide variety of "fans" posting here.
I'm not sure the Stones have any concept what "their audience" consists of these days. They still live in a world dominated by record labels, promoters, agents; their insulation seems bullet-proof.
Their online/soc media efforts seem pro-forma to me. The world now allows for complete disintermediation: an artist can get right up next to his/her readers/viewers/listeners, without all the organizational & bureaucratic bullshit of the past.
But its hard to imagine the Stones at this stage of their lives and career becoming that kind of band; why would they bother when they can just roll out every few years and barnstorm with warhorses?
The fact of the matter is the Stones do know their audience better than anyone. That's why we get what we get. The hardcore's problem is that we are just a small minority of the fan base. That doesn't mean Mick doesn't consider us, he most certainly does. It was us that showed the most enthusiasm for them continuing, and now that they have we can't find enough to whine and bitch about. We can only hope for a future club tour. Otherwise, it's going to be more of the same.
Quote
LongBeachArena72Quote
JumpinJackOLanternQuote
LongBeachArena72Quote
stonesrule
Mick wouldn't still be performing if he didn't comprehend the various facets of the concert (as opposed to video) audience...although it would take a psychiatrist to explain the "audience" as personifed by the wide variety of "fans" posting here.
I'm not sure the Stones have any concept what "their audience" consists of these days. They still live in a world dominated by record labels, promoters, agents; their insulation seems bullet-proof.
Their online/soc media efforts seem pro-forma to me. The world now allows for complete disintermediation: an artist can get right up next to his/her readers/viewers/listeners, without all the organizational & bureaucratic bullshit of the past.
But its hard to imagine the Stones at this stage of their lives and career becoming that kind of band; why would they bother when they can just roll out every few years and barnstorm with warhorses?
The fact of the matter is the Stones do know their audience better than anyone. That's why we get what we get. The hardcore's problem is that we are just a small minority of the fan base. That doesn't mean Mick doesn't consider us, he most certainly does. It was us that showed the most enthusiasm for them continuing, and now that they have we can't find enough to whine and bitch about. We can only hope for a future club tour. Otherwise, it's going to be more of the same.
Not sure I agree, but I see your point. It's a tough one. I see so many artists in the Kickstarter age who could not exist w/o their direct relationship with their fans. That's the way of the future. The Stones, obviously, will never be like that, do not NEED to be like that, at least in part because it's HARD WORK and they are more often than not in semi-retirement.
But they are leaving a lot of interesting experiments and cool projects on the table by not continuing to push the envelope as they once did.