Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: 123Next
Current Page: 1 of 3
Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: GumbootCloggeroo ()
Date: May 8, 2013 05:20

These are from a book of photographs by Daniel Angeli and Jean-Paul Dousset entitled "Private Pictures".



Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: Title5Take1 ()
Date: May 8, 2013 05:24

Bill has those pics in his coffee table Stones book. I think Bill enjoyed including them. smiling smiley

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Date: May 8, 2013 05:36

That picture of Jagger on the ground makes me mad. That is so f&cking ass-backwards.

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: triceratops ()
Date: May 8, 2013 05:47

Quote
Palace Revolution 2000
That picture of Jagger on the ground makes me mad. That is so f&cking ass-backwards.

Jagger and photographer had a fight in NYC. Jagger lost. This is what I remember from years ago

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: dougie ()
Date: May 8, 2013 05:47

Who knows? Mick could have called someone who knows someone. That paparazzi could have spent a few nights in the hospital. At least I hope that is what happened.

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: stonehearted ()
Date: May 8, 2013 05:48

Quote
Palace Revolution 2000
That picture of Jagger on the ground makes me mad. That is so f&cking ass-backwards.

Yes, Keith would have shown the guy the blade and broke his camera--say, wasn't Keith arrested once in Boston for fighting with a photographer, which made The Stones 5 hours late for a show?

With Keith it would have been a totally different outcome. Charlie, too, would have smacked that pizzarazzi right in the face like a snare drum. Woody, well, he probably would have wound up on the ground as well, as he's a bit of a lightweight.

The story of why Jagger now has BIG BODY GUARDS
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: May 8, 2013 06:03

Anwering the question about Mick's Body Guards.

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: DoomandGloom ()
Date: May 8, 2013 06:38

That is so wrong,

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: uhbuhgullayew ()
Date: May 8, 2013 06:55

The point of this post is.....what exactly???

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: whitem8 ()
Date: May 8, 2013 07:09

Quote
stonehearted
Quote
Palace Revolution 2000
That picture of Jagger on the ground makes me mad. That is so f&cking ass-backwards.

Yes, Keith would have shown the guy the blade and broke his camera--say, wasn't Keith arrested once in Boston for fighting with a photographer, which made The Stones 5 hours late for a show?

With Keith it would have been a totally different outcome. Charlie, too, would have smacked that pizzarazzi right in the face like a snare drum. Woody, well, he probably would have wound up on the ground as well, as he's a bit of a lightweight.

You mean Keith would have had one of his beefed up body guards do the actual fighting. Keith is a small scrawny guy who would be lucky to get in a single punch. And the blade? Yeah I doubt it. Again, he can afford to be brave and brash with his 200 lb body guards having his back.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-05-08 07:10 by whitem8.

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: treaclefingers ()
Date: May 8, 2013 07:09

Quote
uhbuhgullayew
The point of this post is.....what exactly???

I think it is something like this: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses

True, pretty one dimensional thread

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: Come On ()
Date: May 8, 2013 08:33

Paparazzi vs. paparazzi+Jagger
1 - 0

2 1 2 0

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: GravityBoy ()
Date: May 8, 2013 12:29

Quote
GumbootCloggeroo

Actually I think Mick is positioning himself for the shin attack.

Kung Fu was very popular back then.

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Date: May 8, 2013 12:40

Quote
GravityBoy
Quote
GumbootCloggeroo

Actually I think Mick is positioning himself for the shin attack.

Kung Fu was very popular back then.

I mean, look at that picture. Jagger is not a perpetrator here. If Jagger was a criminal, or even still an entertainer, just a real @#$%&, but he is not. He is the one who has been giving to the others. And I don't mean this in a bleeding heart way ("..all I do is give, give, give...") but as a fact: Jagger sings, writes great songs, does great shows, is a pretty nice guy, and some ASSH*LE! thunks he has the right to knock him on the ground when he is out with his wife. It is freakin backwards.

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: beepee2 ()
Date: May 8, 2013 12:43

Looks like the force his very strong in the paparazzi (he masters the Shaolin one-finger KO technique), or maybe it's just Mick who lacks proteins.

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: Munichhilton ()
Date: May 8, 2013 18:32

ankle biter

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: GRNRBITW ()
Date: May 8, 2013 18:35

it's all for the greater glory...all for a saturday night even....

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: treaclefingers ()
Date: May 8, 2013 18:44

Quote
GRNRBITW
it's all for the greater glory...all for a saturday night even....

Well, if Saturday night is indeed alright for fighting, then Mick should just pick himself up and get on with it already!

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: GRNRBITW ()
Date: May 8, 2013 18:47

Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
GRNRBITW
it's all for the greater glory...all for a saturday night even....

Well, if Saturday night is indeed alright for fighting, then Mick should just pick himself up and get on with it already!

he's the singer, not the song after all....

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: treaclefingers ()
Date: May 8, 2013 18:48

Quote
GRNRBITW
Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
GRNRBITW
it's all for the greater glory...all for a saturday night even....

Well, if Saturday night is indeed alright for fighting, then Mick should just pick himself up and get on with it already!

he's the singer, not the song after all....

...or else he's a lover, not a fighter

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: Turning To Gold ()
Date: May 8, 2013 19:34

Seems odd that Jerry Hall (?) ditches Mick and is absent in the last photos. Did she go with the photographer, I wonder?

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: lem motlow ()
Date: May 8, 2013 19:57

one of the worst breakdowns in security ever.that photog guy was some martial arts jerkoff who was trying to show what a badass he was.

elvis used to tell the memphis mafia boys " if some son of a bitch gets to me make sure you kill him,dont let him go around bragging about it."

the sixties rock stars had terrible security at times which ended tragically with john lennons murder.[i know i'm not the biggest beatles fan but we're talking about something serious here.]

luckily this psycho celebrity stalker with the camera only knocked mick down.

and yes keith would've had his bodyguards mess the guy up,and rightly so.

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: dcba ()
Date: May 8, 2013 20:38

I think it happened in Paris in the late 70's and the snapper had a black belt in karate or sth like that...

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: runaway ()
Date: May 8, 2013 20:38

After JL tragedy was a major change in security
I myself can't stand paparazzi and gossip

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: NICOS ()
Date: May 8, 2013 20:57

Paparazzi............they should shoot them all, altough I'm against wapens I will make an exception

__________________________

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: Big Al ()
Date: May 8, 2013 21:18

Who's to say Jagger wasn't asking for a shove?

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: lem motlow ()
Date: May 8, 2013 21:28

Quote
Big Al
Who's to say Jagger wasn't asking for a shove?


common sense-the photog was there because of jagger.


if you follow someone and they say" get the hell away from me" and you stay and get into a confrontation with them,you are a nutcase and a stalker,simple as that.

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: Hairball ()
Date: May 8, 2013 21:29

Quote
Big Al
Who's to say Jagger wasn't asking for a shove?

Thats what I thought Big Al.

It looks like Mick is being the agressor by approaching the photographer.
Maybe trying to impress his lady, looks like he started something he couldn't finish.

_____________________________________________________________
Rip this joint, gonna save your soul, round and round and round we go......



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-05-08 21:29 by Hairball.

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: GravityBoy ()
Date: May 8, 2013 21:50

EIIIIAAAAOOOOWW!!!!





Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-05-08 21:51 by GravityBoy.

Re: Jagger vs. Paparazzi. Jagger loses.
Posted by: lem motlow ()
Date: May 8, 2013 21:54

okay let me try again because i can see some of you are a little slow..

1.we can assume that mick jagger doesnt spend time stalking photographers,correct?

2. so that would lead us to believe the guy was there because of mick,correct?

3.this is how this works-its not ok to follow people around who dont want you there,if they say"fukc off and get lost" you say no problem and leave.

4.you dont,for any reason follow someone,get into an altercation with them and then knock them to the ground.
if you are following a person and they indicate in any way, shape or form that its not ok for you to be there,leave.do not attack the person,leave.

5.thats all,you can now rejoin the rest of society.

Goto Page: 123Next
Current Page: 1 of 3


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 1736
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home