For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Marhsall
So...Mick is doing demos with Clifford now instead of Keith? Wtf?
Quote
jloweQuote
Marhsall
So...Mick is doing demos with Clifford now instead of Keith? Wtf?
Does Clifford receive any royalties?
I believe Steve Jordan gets a 33% composer credit on one of the royalty sites for D and G.
Quote
jloweQuote
Marhsall
So...Mick is doing demos with Clifford now instead of Keith? Wtf?
Does Clifford receive any royalties?
I believe Steve Jordan gets a 33% composer credit on one of the royalty sites for D and G.
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
jloweQuote
Marhsall
So...Mick is doing demos with Clifford now instead of Keith? Wtf?
Does Clifford receive any royalties?
I believe Steve Jordan gets a 33% composer credit on one of the royalty sites for D and G.
No one gets royalties for recording demos. They get paid for session time if they get paid at all.
Not to mention how good they sound on the new blues album as well....Quote
jloweQuote
GasLightStreetQuote
jloweQuote
Marhsall
So...Mick is doing demos with Clifford now instead of Keith? Wtf?
Does Clifford receive any royalties?
I believe Steve Jordan gets a 33% composer credit on one of the royalty sites for D and G.
No one gets royalties for recording demos. They get paid for session time if they get paid at all.
Well, I wasn't referring to the actual recording.
More the creation of the song...ie composer royalties.
So Keith receives 50% but did his creative input amount to anymore than say, Ronnie, for example?
Quote
HMS
Doom And Gloom is indeed a fantastic track and imo only a few steps away from songs like JJF.
Quote
HMS
Never understood why they suddenly stopped to perform it live.
Quote
HMS
Should there be a tour in 2017 I hope Doom And Gloom becomes a regular part of the setlist. It´s not only a great tune, it also worked perfectly on stage.
One Hit, Flip The Switch & Doom And Gloom - what a live-trilogy that would be!

Quote
Screamer
People can say what they want, but for me this was the song that got me hooked on the Rolling Stones in same way that "Start Me Up" did for kids in early 80's, and because of that it will always be very special for me.
I was just a regular 14-year-old browsing my Facebook feed one day in 2012 when I saw a friend of mine, who was more into classic rock music because of her father, shared this song. I was shocked to learn that not only this 50-year-old band was still active, but they even released a new song and had a tour. And oh boy, what an energetic, modern, fun and powerful song that was! I also finally understood what people meant by "moves like Jagger". It got me so hooked that I bought GRRR!, after that started listening to the albums chronologically, and the rest is history. I don't write often on this forum, but I visit it almost every day and sometimes I get sad because most people here have been fans since 60's, 70's and 80's and seems like I've missed the party by becoming a fan only in 2010's, but hey - better late than never.

Quote
bitusa2012
Musically great.
Lyrically stupid.
Production wise... Too cluttered and loud.
Often on Perth radio, still, but hasn't aged well because it's too dense. 24 track recording? Don't fill up every track. 16 track? Ditto. Leave some space.
Quote
Screamer
People can say what they want, but for me this was the song that got me hooked on the Rolling Stones in same way that "Start Me Up" did for kids in early 80's, and because of that it will always be very special for me.
I was just a regular 14-year-old browsing my Facebook feed one day in 2012 when I saw a friend of mine, who was more into classic rock music because of her father, shared this song. I was shocked to learn that not only this 50-year-old band was still active, but they even released a new song and had a tour. And oh boy, what an energetic, modern, fun and powerful song that was! I also finally understood what people meant by "moves like Jagger". It got me so hooked that I bought GRRR!, after that started listening to the albums chronologically, and the rest is history. I don't write often on this forum, but I visit it almost every day and sometimes I get sad because most people here have been fans since 60's, 70's and 80's and seems like I've missed the party by becoming a fan only in 2010's, but hey - better late than never.
You found the right band!Quote
KRiffhard
A decent Jagger's solo song and nothing more.
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
KRiffhard
A decent Jagger's solo song and nothing more.
have to disagree...it's a good jagger solo song.
It seems like Mick has no confidence in any new material they come up with. He almost assumes an apologetic stance when introducing new songs, automatically assuming that everyone is there only for the hits and couldn't possibly want to hear vital new material from an active, working band.Quote
GasLightStreet
Why did Mick rush this track live? I'll never understand that. Seems like his vision of having the Stones play that new song live as an ancient band was undermined by his rushing it.
Quote
Screamer
People can say what they want, but for me this was the song that got me hooked on the Rolling Stones in same way that "Start Me Up" did for kids in early 80's, and because of that it will always be very special for me.
I was just a regular 14-year-old browsing my Facebook feed one day in 2012 when I saw a friend of mine, who was more into classic rock music because of her father, shared this song. I was shocked to learn that not only this 50-year-old band was still active, but they even released a new song and had a tour. And oh boy, what an energetic, modern, fun and powerful song that was! I also finally understood what people meant by "moves like Jagger". It got me so hooked that I bought GRRR!, after that started listening to the albums chronologically, and the rest is history. I don't write often on this forum, but I visit it almost every day and sometimes I get sad because most people here have been fans since 60's, 70's and 80's and seems like I've missed the party by becoming a fan only in 2010's, but hey - better late than never.
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
KRiffhard
A decent Jagger's solo song and nothing more.
have to disagree...it's a good jagger solo song.
Quote
keefriff99It seems like Mick has no confidence in any new material they come up with. He almost assumes an apologetic stance when introducing new songs, automatically assuming that everyone is there only for the hits and couldn't possibly want to hear vital new material from an active, working band.Quote
GasLightStreet
Why did Mick rush this track live? I'll never understand that. Seems like his vision of having the Stones play that new song live as an ancient band was undermined by his rushing it.
No wonder new material doesn't go over when he doesn't even attempt to sell it with any conviction.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
keefriff99It seems like Mick has no confidence in any new material they come up with. He almost assumes an apologetic stance when introducing new songs, automatically assuming that everyone is there only for the hits and couldn't possibly want to hear vital new material from an active, working band.Quote
GasLightStreet
Why did Mick rush this track live? I'll never understand that. Seems like his vision of having the Stones play that new song live as an ancient band was undermined by his rushing it.
No wonder new material doesn't go over when he doesn't even attempt to sell it with any conviction.
He wanted to save his voice. The oldest trick in the book for singers. Same with TD and IORR. Avoid long notes, just talk through them.
Quote
Markdog
It's a catchy tune for late day Stone's.
They crossed a line for me with the digital drums on it though. That is not Charlie in fact I am certain it's a drum program.
They allow a real analog drum fill at the very end to try to fool you.
Quote
Screamer
People can say what they want, but for me this was the song that got me hooked on the Rolling Stones in same way that "Start Me Up" did for kids in early 80's, and because of that it will always be very special for me.
I was just a regular 14-year-old browsing my Facebook feed one day in 2012 when I saw a friend of mine, who was more into classic rock music because of her father, shared this song. I was shocked to learn that not only this 50-year-old band was still active, but they even released a new song and had a tour. And oh boy, what an energetic, modern, fun and powerful song that was! I also finally understood what people meant by "moves like Jagger". It got me so hooked that I bought GRRR!, after that started listening to the albums chronologically, and the rest is history. I don't write often on this forum, but I visit it almost every day and sometimes I get sad because most people here have been fans since 60's, 70's and 80's and seems like I've missed the party by becoming a fan only in 2010's, but hey - better late than never.
Quote
Screamer
People can say what they want, but for me this was the song that got me hooked on the Rolling Stones in same way that "Start Me Up" did for kids in early 80's, and because of that it will always be very special for me.
I was just a regular 14-year-old browsing my Facebook feed one day in 2012 when I saw a friend of mine, who was more into classic rock music because of her father, shared this song. I was shocked to learn that not only this 50-year-old band was still active, but they even released a new song and had a tour. And oh boy, what an energetic, modern, fun and powerful song that was! I also finally understood what people meant by "moves like Jagger". It got me so hooked that I bought GRRR!, after that started listening to the albums chronologically, and the rest is history. I don't write often on this forum, but I visit it almost every day and sometimes I get sad because most people here have been fans since 60's, 70's and 80's and seems like I've missed the party by becoming a fan only in 2010's, but hey - better late than never.
