Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: Previous1234567891011...LastNext
Current Page: 5 of 15
Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: with sssoul ()
Date: November 20, 2013 21:31

Quote
2000 LYFH
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
with sssoul
I recall reading an interview where Bill said that Moonlight Mile started off as "Keith's Japanese Thing" ...

Thanks!!! THAT was the quote I was looking for. You have made my day, dear with sssoul grinning smiley

Here is Keith's quote again from 71: I thought I wasn't on Moonlight Mile but the last riff everybody gets into playing is a riff I'd been playing on earlier tapes before I dropped out.

But but but I wasn't talking about a quote from Keith.
I remember Bill Wyman referring to it as being based on "Keith's Japanese Thing".

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: runaway ()
Date: November 20, 2013 21:44

"Keith's Japanese Thing"; To put some ideas on to tape for the next album.
Mick Taylor toke the beginnings....

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: kleermaker ()
Date: November 20, 2013 22:07

I'm still asking Dandie to point out the exact time for that so called Japanese thing, but he only describes it and I'm too unmusical to understand him. So gimme the beginning time and the ending time of this Japanese specialty. Maybe then MM turns out to be a real Keith song.

Anyway: SF is the Stones' Abbey Road: finest album they ever made, MM among the finest songs they ever put on record. It would be great to hear it live with Taylor on electric guitar.

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Date: November 20, 2013 22:20

Thank you for your confidence in me, kleerie, but I didn't write the song, neither did I (mis)name its working title.

My guess, which probably is as good as yours, is that Keith had the riff to the ending of the song ("da-da. Da-da-da-da-da-da. Da-da" ), the one that Taylor says he suggested needed strings.

In no way is it japanese, but probably it was named that way, for Keith to remember it for picking it up later, who knows - ask Bill...

I don't have it here, and can't give you the exact timing for where it starts. I reckon you know where it is by now, you rascal winking smiley



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-11-20 22:22 by DandelionPowderman.

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: runaway ()
Date: November 20, 2013 22:21

Quote
kleermaker
I'm still asking Dandie to point out the exact time for that so called Japanese thing, but he only describes it and I'm too unmusical to understand him. So gimme the beginning time and the ending time of this Japanese specialty. Maybe then MM turns out to be a real Keith song.

Anyway: SF is the Stones' Abbey Road: finest album they ever made, MM among the finest songs they ever put on record. It would be great to hear it live with Taylor on electric guitar.


it is impossible to measure artistic creativity

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: treaclefingers ()
Date: November 20, 2013 22:24

Quote
runaway
Quote
kleermaker
I'm still asking Dandie to point out the exact time for that so called Japanese thing, but he only describes it and I'm too unmusical to understand him. So gimme the beginning time and the ending time of this Japanese specialty. Maybe then MM turns out to be a real Keith song.

Anyway: SF is the Stones' Abbey Road: finest album they ever made, MM among the finest songs they ever put on record. It would be great to hear it live with Taylor on electric guitar.


it is impossible to measure artistic creativity

you're just not trying hard enough. quit being an underachiever!

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: runaway ()
Date: November 20, 2013 22:31

Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
runaway
Quote
kleermaker
I'm still asking Dandie to point out the exact time for that so called Japanese thing, but he only describes it and I'm too unmusical to understand him. So gimme the beginning time and the ending time of this Japanese specialty. Maybe then MM turns out to be a real Keith song.

Anyway: SF is the Stones' Abbey Road: finest album they ever made, MM among the finest songs they ever put on record. It would be great to hear it live with Taylor on electric guitar.


it is impossible to measure artistic creativity

you're just not trying hard enough. quit being an underachiever!

Can you analize a creative session?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-11-21 15:42 by runaway.

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: His Majesty ()
Date: November 20, 2013 22:43

Quote
runaway


Can you measure creativity processes?

Yes.

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: runaway ()
Date: November 20, 2013 22:51

Quote
His Majesty
Quote
runaway


Can you measure creativity processes?[/quote

Yes.


I think you can when you are there and musically capably , but if you not around at the time it may be a problem...

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: kleermaker ()
Date: November 20, 2013 22:59

Quote
DandelionPowderman
Thank you for your confidence in me, kleerie, but I didn't write the song, neither did I (mis)name its working title.

My guess, which probably is as good as yours, is that Keith had the riff to the ending of the song ("da-da. Da-da-da-da-da-da. Da-da" ), the one that Taylor says he suggested needed strings.

In no way is it japanese, but probably it was named that way, for Keith to remember it for picking it up later, who knows - ask Bill...

I don't have it here, and can't give you the exact timing for where it starts. I reckon you know where it is by now, you rascal winking smiley

No I honestly don't. Please gimme the time, so I can judge it myself. I promise an honest comment.

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: DoomandGloom ()
Date: November 20, 2013 23:11

Quote
runaway
Quote
His Majesty
Quote
runaway


Can you measure creativity processes?[/quote

Yes.


I think you can when you are there and musically capably , but if you not around at the time it may be a problem...
they were pretty high but it sounds as if Taylor stored ideas in his head and hands for KR and Mick... Harrison did the same for Lennon.

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: treaclefingers ()
Date: November 21, 2013 00:54

Quote
runaway
Quote
His Majesty
Quote
runaway


Can you measure creativity processes?[/quote

Yes.


I think you can when you are there and musically capably , but if you not around at the time it may be a problem...

You folded like a cheap tent runaway...stand your ground man!

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Date: November 21, 2013 02:00

Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
runaway
Quote
His Majesty
Quote
runaway


Can you measure creativity processes?[/quote

Yes.


I think you can when you are there and musically capably , but if you not around at the time it may be a problem...

You folded like a cheap tent runaway...stand your ground man!

Is that possible? It's like demanding a firm handshake from guys with nicknames like mine...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-11-21 02:03 by DandelionPowderman.

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: nightskyman ()
Date: November 21, 2013 02:43

Quote
DoomandGloom
Quote
runaway
Quote
His Majesty
Quote
runaway


Can you measure creativity processes?[/quote

Yes.


I think you can when you are there and musically capably , but if you not around at the time it may be a problem...
they were pretty high but it sounds as if Taylor stored ideas in his head and hands for KR and Mick... Harrison did the same for Lennon.

Examples of Harrison doing this for Lennon?

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: SweetThing ()
Date: November 21, 2013 07:44

Quote
DandelionPowderman
I give up the MM-song writing debate.

If so many of you are convinced that Mick Taylor WROTE this song, so be it.

I suggest you go through his catalogue of the songs that he has written, and form your own opinion, though - instead of stating he wrote this one, just because Keith wasn't present in the studio smiling smiley

Or, alternatively, we could speculate on whether you would determine Denny Laine co wrote Mull of Kintyre had McCartney not given him credit, based upon all his other commercially poorly received material featuring his writing credits.

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Date: November 21, 2013 08:05

Speculate away, mate smiling smiley

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: stonehearted ()
Date: November 21, 2013 08:21

Quote
SweetThing
we could speculate on whether you would determine Denny Laine co wrote Mull of Kintyre had McCartney not given him credit, based upon all his other commercially poorly received material featuring his writing credits.

Denny Laine wrote a series of a dozen fabulous singles and B-sides with The Moody Blues between 1964 and 1966.

That they had no chart success after Go Now in 1965 was more the result of bad management (who absconded with their money after Go Now became a hit) and record company indifference. They were, on the other hand, huge in France right up to the end of that line-up of the band.

Also, Laine formed a group after this called the Electric String Band that released a single in 1967 called Say You Don't Mind. As a group pioneering the type of arrangements that would later be made commercially viable by the likes of Electric Light Orchestra, it's anyone's guess why the band didn't have success with that single, but when recorded by Colin Blunstone in 1972 it became a UK top 20 song (#15).





By the way, on the Denny Laine version, that's Viv Prince of The Pretty Things, who had also joined Laine's Electric String Band.





If you judge a songwriter in terms of how well they are received commercially, then Lou Reed must have been one of the worst of all time.confused smiley

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: Witness ()
Date: November 21, 2013 10:49

Quote
DandelionPowderman
Maybe they tried something similar with Time Waits For No One, but imo without succeeding.

<and realized that there is nothing to add what is already said here>

grinning smiley

Great post, Doxa thumbs up

Reading this and Doxa's great preceding post (on page 4 of this thread), one thought (or rather a question) that I never have had before, comes to me: In all its deliberate difference from "Moonlight Mile", is there a commmon denominator for " Moonlight Mile" and, in case, taken into another "direction", "Can You Hear the Music"?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-11-21 10:52 by Witness.

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Date: November 21, 2013 10:57

Quote
Witness
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Maybe they tried something similar with Time Waits For No One, but imo without succeeding.

<and realized that there is nothing to add what is already said here>

grinning smiley

Great post, Doxa thumbs up

Reading this and Doxa's great preceding post (on page 4 of this thread), one thought (or rather a question) that I never have had before, comes to me: In all its deliberate difference from "Moonlight Mile", is there a commmon denominator for " Moonlight Mile" and, in case, taken into another "direction", "Can You Hear the Music"?

Atmospherically, I agree with you. Creatively, I'm not sure if CYHTM is up to par with what they achieved with MM, even though I love the song.

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Date: November 21, 2013 11:04

Here you go, kleerie.

The riff Keith said he had been playing, before MM was developed, starts at 3:32





Taylor's guitar from 4:30 and on is just hauntingly beautiful! thumbs up

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: runaway ()
Date: November 21, 2013 11:09

"The Japanese Thing" ; Recording methods were changing considerably-The Stones had set up a mobile unit in an air-conditioned truck and this was used by Keith
Richards early in 1970 to put some ideas (hence The Japanese Thing) on to tape for the next album. Moonlight Mile was conceived in this way.

Keith Richards reckons part of his original guitar workings were included near the end of the track.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-11-21 15:36 by runaway.

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: crholmstrom ()
Date: November 21, 2013 12:14

My favorite Stones cover of all time followed closely by Tegan & Sara's "Fool to Cry". Flaming Lips are pretty much my favorite band.



Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: Doxa ()
Date: November 21, 2013 13:02

Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
Witness
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Maybe they tried something similar with Time Waits For No One, but imo without succeeding.

<and realized that there is nothing to add what is already said here>

grinning smiley

Great post, Doxa thumbs up

Reading this and Doxa's great preceding post (on page 4 of this thread), one thought (or rather a question) that I never have had before, comes to me: In all its deliberate difference from "Moonlight Mile", is there a commmon denominator for " Moonlight Mile" and, in case, taken into another "direction", "Can You Hear the Music"?

Atmospherically, I agree with you. Creatively, I'm not sure if CYHTM is up to par with what they achieved with MM, even though I love the song.

Never occurred to me either, but yeah there is that "atmosphorical" resemblance, which I take to be mean some "oriental" or, if we like, "world music" influences in them (it seems to be that whenever something non-Western or non-afro-American happens in a pop song frame, those two notions are used). The melody line and structure in verses of "Moonlight Mile" or "Can't You Hear Music" surely isn't typical pop thing, to put it mildly. (For me the "Japanese Thing" has always referred to the basic riff/melody of of "Mile"; a kind of geisha stuff, and I recall thinking so even before I had heard anything of "Japanese Thing"...). And then in both songs the "oriental" flavor is faded away all of sudden, when the more familiar sounding part starts (for a while; the chorus in "Mile", the melodical middle part in "Music?").

Maybe an own thread for "oriental"/"world music" Stones tunes? (What there are? "Paint It Black", "Gomper", "Moonlight Mile", "Can't You Hear The Music", "Continental Drift"...) They were not just a 'Baroque Pop' band...grinning smiley

- Doxa



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-11-21 13:06 by Doxa.

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Date: November 21, 2013 13:06

<which I take to be mean some "oriental" or, if we like, "world music" influences>

Hush! Don't say it out loud...

grinning smiley

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: Doxa ()
Date: November 21, 2013 13:18

Quote
DandelionPowderman
<which I take to be mean some "oriental" or, if we like, "world music" influences>

Hush! Don't say it out loud...

grinning smiley

Jagger says "Eastern" - is that better/more politically correct?eye rolling smiley

- Doxa

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Date: November 21, 2013 14:05

Quote
Doxa
Quote
DandelionPowderman
<which I take to be mean some "oriental" or, if we like, "world music" influences>

Hush! Don't say it out loud...

grinning smiley

Jagger says "Eastern" - is that better/more politically correct?eye rolling smiley

- Doxa

For me, yes! For other posters, all oriental analogies are prohibited grinning smiley

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: drewmaster ()
Date: November 21, 2013 15:08

Quote
Doxa
I listened the 'definitive collection' I made of 'most profilic Stones' (there is a thread of it somewhere) the other day and realized that this gem is missing there, and also that I haven't contributed to this track-talk thread either. What unforgettable idiocy from my side!

Anyways, I read the wonderful descriptions here (especially in the first page until the thread is reduced to the endless crediting battles), and realized that there is nothing to add what is already said here, and much better than what I can. What a relief, since what the hell to say for such a masterpiece? One of those very rare songs that go absolutely beyond the realm of words. So instead of saying anything of it, I try to praise it by locating it to the great universe of memorable Rolling Stones songs.

Firstly, I need to confess that I have neglected and ignored "Moonlight Mile" seriously during my life as a Rolling Stones fan. Yes, I have liked its etheric, delicated atmosphere very much, but it was not until very recently I finally realized what a unique, transcendental masterpiece it is. I think in that sense it belongs to the very privileged class in which probably the only other song is "Gimme Shelter". Or to put it other way: I have always tried to figure out if there is any equal to “Gimme Shelter” in Stones catalogue. The question with both of these songs is: where the hell that came from? A real touch of muse in action. If “Gimme Shelter” is Keith’s biggest creative hour, “Moonlight Mile” is Mick’s. Probably “Sympathy for The Devil” is a ‘better’ song, taking the composition and lyrics, but here Jagger steps into deeper musical landscapes, the world of feelings - such as “Gimme Shelter” does in expressing different kind of feelings - in the way the BEGGARS BANQUET masterpiece do not. Here Jagger drifts us to the emotions reflected in music only he and no one else in the world is able to do. And with such honesty and conviction that is extraordinary even for him. I liked the analogy someone mentioned to “A Day In The Life”, but I add another one: if “Sympathy For The Devil” is “Desolation Row”, “Moonlight Mile” is “Like A Rolling Stone”.

To me “Moonlight Mile”, like “Gimme Shelter”, is a mystery. What chemicals Jagger used to come up with this one? And just a few years earlier he just added lyrics to Keith’s songs and finished up melody lines. Trying to compose a pop song by his own, coming up with “Yesterday’s Papers”, then heading to “Sympathy For The Devil” just a year later. Then someone showing him an open guitar tuning, and all of sudden, he comes up with “Brown Sugar”. And then this. No matter how much Mick Taylor had a helping hand here, the guy simply is a genius.

“Moonlight Mile” is the most perfect and most professional sounding piece in their most perfect and most professional sounding album ever. The ‘perfect’ in the traditional sense of the word that does not require any Rolling Stones idiosyncrasy trained ears (such as EXILE, BEGGARS or SOME GIRLS need). It is just great songs and awesome – perfect and tight – delivery of them. Their stylistic touch is as close to perfection that is almost odd to think it is The Rolling Stones we talk here, be the genre they want to master country, soul ballad, hard rock, you name it… and then “Moonlight Mile” whatever it is, would most likely charm even the most trained Pink Floyd/Mike Oldfield spoiled ‘progressive rock’ ears. To my ears STICKY FINGERS is the album in which the claim “greatest rock and roll band in the world” is stated in vinyl, using the highest criteria available in the peak age of ‘classic rock’. If GET YER YA-YA’S OUT! had shown their live credibility to the claim, this makes it in studio output.

So one way is to see “Moonlight Mile” as one kind of career highlight, the very top they reached in their career by then. Think the route from ”Tell Me” and “As Tears Go By” to “Satisfaction” and “Paint It Black” , from “Ruby Tuesday” and “2000 Light Years From Home” to “Gimme Shelter” and, yes, “Moonlight Mile”… Album like EXILE ON MAIN STREET was a kind of reaction to the ambitious, forward-looking drive that had kicked their asses up until then, and don’t even trying to touch such high creative mountains any longer – but just “let it go” with a free spirit. Even though EXILE might be their biggest artistic statement ever – the Rolling Stones in their most essential non-compromised, relaxed, down to earth, chaotic nature – it lacks not just distinguished big radio hits a’la “Jumpin Jack Flash”, “Honky Tonk Women” or “Brown Sugar”, but also the striking, ambitious space-needing album highlights such as “Moonlight Mile”, “Gimme Shelter”, “Sympathy For The Devil”, “Midnight Rambler”, “Can’t You Hear Me Knocking?” and “You Can’t Always Get What You Want” the other ‘golden era’ albums were famous for. The era of making epic songs was over. “Moonlight Mile”, with “Can’t You Hear Me Knocking?”, is the Last of the Mohicans. They would later occasionally still try to over-come the three/four minute song barrier with bigger musical statements – say “Fingerprint File”, “Memory Motel” and even “Miss You” – but more or less they have followed the route of EXILE ON MAIN STREET relying on their natural groove and instinct ability to create a short coherent musical piece out of simple elements.

Let the last word go to Mick Taylor. No matter how much he was involved in writing the song, what we can hear in the final version could be his greatest contribution in any Stones studio song. Here Taylor, if ever, is stepping to Brian Jones's shoes, by adding a dimension by his own unique touch, which lifts up the song higher, as Jones would do in his best days. So, to my ears "Moonlight Mile" is regards to Taylor, the same as "Ruby Tuesday" is regards to Jones.

That will do. grinning smiley

- Doxa

Brilliant post, Doxa.

Drew

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: Mathijs ()
Date: November 21, 2013 16:28

Quote
DandelionPowderman
Here you go, kleerie.

The riff Keith said he had been playing, before MM was developed, starts at 3:32





Taylor's guitar from 4:30 and on is just hauntingly beautiful! thumbs up

but but but -there's nothing 'Japanese' about that riff. That riff is a fairly straightforward minor riff in open G, and according to Taylor that was his.

The 'eastern' sounding bits are the string section over that minor open G riff, and Taylor's rephrasing of the main riff starting at 4:30. He starts the notes with up-bends, and that makes it a bit 'Japanese' (if you don't know Japanese music, that is).

Mathijs

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: kleermaker ()
Date: November 21, 2013 16:31

Quote
DandelionPowderman
Here you go, kleerie.

The riff Keith said he had been playing, before MM was developed, starts at 3:32

thumbs up

O well, and he thinks he rightly deserves songwriting credit for that. He's a funny guy indeed. The Japanese thing ....

Re: Track Talk: Moonlight Mile
Posted by: SweetThing ()
Date: November 21, 2013 16:48

Quote
kleermaker
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Here you go, kleerie.

The riff Keith said he had been playing, before MM was developed, starts at 3:32

thumbs up

O well, and he thinks he rightly deserves songwriting credit for that. He's a funny guy indeed. The Japanese thing ....

A funny guy indeed, in a lot of funny threads here. But we all know when "seemingly" Bill Wyman was banging away on the piano and then Mick and Keef come in and JJF is born.... it doesn't count, now does it? It was "changed" and all that...

Goto Page: Previous1234567891011...LastNext
Current Page: 5 of 15


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 615
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home