Quote
MisterDDDD

Quote
stone4ever

Quote
MisterDDDD
stoned4ever-

Give it a rest man, unless you can produce a quote backing up your claim that he outright called him what you claim, you are way out of bounds. I would go so far as to say your repeated accusations qualify as disrespectful harassment outlined by bv. Also- your dime-store psychology borders on the absurd. Best to stick with what you know- Mick and Ronnie bashing.

You have been trying to get me banned for ages, give it a break.

Lofl.
If calling you out on your bs qualifies as "trying to get you banned" then you may be on to something. I don't care enough about your posts to try to ban you from anything. You think much too highly of yourself.

Quote
stonehearted

This pattern seems to emerge whenever a tour starts, when the passions of Rolling Stones fandom seem to be at their fiercest and most storm-like.

Quote
drbryant

Quote
LongBeachArena72

1) Today, a poster who hates what The Rolling Stones have become was called a child molester by another poster. Apparently, the Stones-hater is no longer part of our 'community' while the pedophile-label-flinger is tolerated ... perhaps since his primary impulse was to stand up for the reputation of the band this website purports to discuss.

Come on. We're educated adults here, and no one would have read my post as calling stones-relic a child molester. Stones-relic went nuts; he's been on here a while, and no one knows why. He started a couple of threads, and went on multiple unrelated threads on a Stones forum posting how the Stones suck. He said that he got enjoyment out of making fans feel upset or hurt. Classic trolling behavior.

I merely mentioned, in a clearly mock-serious tone, that internet trolling has been associated with the "dark tetrad" of human personality - narcissism, machiavellianism, psychopathy and sadism. These traits, particularly sadism, are often seen in people who engage in more extreme forms of anti-social behavior. I just cited the theories in general, and never said stones-relic was a child molester. That's ridiculous. Not every child that enjoys pulling the wings off flies, or bullying the smaller kids in grade school ends up being a serial killer. My post was tongue-in-cheek and just meant to give the troll a small dose of his own medicine.

I think everyone on the Forum got it.

Quote
Hairball

Quote
Doxa


- Doxa

Quote
HankM

Quote
Hairball

juts keep stirring the pot slimeball

Quote
HankM
I am out of patience with trolls, nit pickers, set list whiners and Stones haters who feel obligated to show up and talk shit on the greatest band ever as they are back rolling again.

Of all the crap going on in this world, all the bad things that happen, bad people.. .and you a-holes chose to spend you time talking crap about this band? And then you whine when someone calls you out for it?


If you wanna talk crap there are a lot of legit things to talk it about, The Stones are not one of them.

Quote
Redhotcarpet

Quote
HankM
I am out of patience with trolls, nit pickers, set list whiners and Stones haters who feel obligated to show up and talk shit on the greatest band ever as they are back rolling again.

Of all the crap going on in this world, all the bad things that happen, bad people.. .and you a-holes chose to spend you time talking crap about this band? And then you whine when someone calls you out for it?


If you wanna talk crap there are a lot of legit things to talk it about, The Stones are not one of them.

You've made that clear.

Quote
HankM

Quote
Hairball

juts keep stirring the pot slimeball

Quote
DandelionPowderman
Everybody happy with the show tonight?

Quote
HankM

Quote
Redhotcarpet

Quote
HankM
I am out of patience with trolls, nit pickers, set list whiners and Stones haters who feel obligated to show up and talk shit on the greatest band ever as they are back rolling again.

Of all the crap going on in this world, all the bad things that happen, bad people.. .and you a-holes chose to spend you time talking crap about this band? And then you whine when someone calls you out for it?


If you wanna talk crap there are a lot of legit things to talk it about, The Stones are not one of them.

You've made that clear.

Why are you chiming in? what is you objective? This was all over and you had nothing to do with it. Do you have a point or just wanting to cause more problems? Get a thrill? What are you doing?

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
Redhotcarpet

Quote
HankM

Quote
Redhotcarpet

Quote
HankM
I am out of patience with trolls, nit pickers, set list whiners and Stones haters who feel obligated to show up and talk shit on the greatest band ever as they are back rolling again.

Of all the crap going on in this world, all the bad things that happen, bad people.. .and you a-holes chose to spend you time talking crap about this band? And then you whine when someone calls you out for it?


If you wanna talk crap there are a lot of legit things to talk it about, The Stones are not one of them.

You've made that clear.

Why are you chiming in? what is you objective? This was all over and you had nothing to do with it. Do you have a point or just wanting to cause more problems? Get a thrill? What are you doing?

I never report posts and I dont understand why anybody would be offended by criticism of the Rolling Stones, it's really beyond me, but just because stonesrelic got banned I reported you to see if you get a free pass. The reason is not your poor attempts at bullying but the fact that you get a free pass and so many iorrians seem to agree with you.

Quote
HankM

Quote
Redhotcarpet

Quote
HankM

Quote
Redhotcarpet

Quote
HankM
I am out of patience with trolls, nit pickers, set list whiners and Stones haters who feel obligated to show up and talk shit on the greatest band ever as they are back rolling again.

Of all the crap going on in this world, all the bad things that happen, bad people.. .and you a-holes chose to spend you time talking crap about this band? And then you whine when someone calls you out for it?


If you wanna talk crap there are a lot of legit things to talk it about, The Stones are not one of them.

You've made that clear.

Why are you chiming in? what is you objective? This was all over and you had nothing to do with it. Do you have a point or just wanting to cause more problems? Get a thrill? What are you doing?

I never report posts and I dont understand why anybody would be offended by criticism of the Rolling Stones, it's really beyond me, but just because stonesrelic got banned I reported you to see if you get a free pass. The reason is not your poor attempts at bullying but the fact that you get a free pass and so many iorrians seem to agree with you.

Ah, I see. You are playing the old game "Lets get people banned"... okey doeky...

Quote
Redhotcarpet

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Thanks Dandy.

Quote
DandelionPowderman


Well, this time the thumb was for the link I got to the Stones-show in Munich

Quote
HankM

Quote
DandelionPowderman


Well, this time the thumb was for the link I got to the Stones-show in Munich

My pleasure DPM, I knew that

I didn't think you were in league these ban happy types

Quote
sdstonesguy
The fact HankM has not been banned and even defended by BV makes me wonder if Hank is just an alias of BV. Nobody else on this board would still be here saying these things.

Remember, BV said on another thread that rehearsals are the Stones private business and songs rehearsed should not be shared...despite having links like this: [iorr.org]

& this:
[iorr.org]

When called on it, the thread was closed for comments (to his credit, he left the posts up).

Also, I disagree that BV should be able to regulate the speech here anyway he wants. This is a forum with many people. Should Zuckerberg be able to determine what is "free speech" on Facebook? Since the internet & message boards/twitter/Facebook/etc. are how people communicate now, should a small handful of people simply make the rules to their own individual tastes? I get BV does not want anyone to say a bad word about Trump, but does this being "his" site really make it ok to determine it may not be discussed? This is the most popular Stones message board in the world, not some offbeat small nothing site. This is a defacto Stones board, not a BV board. If the Stones are not putting up some cash to support this site, shame on them...they certainly profit from this site. Then again, I believe that they do. How else does BV get into the Belly-Up gig? The Jagger El-Rey gig? It is not just luck & hard work...those work for things like Shepherds Bush, Double Door, etc.

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
Eleanor Rigby
Yes...
But i would argue being called a paedophile is a bit worse that a person making critical comments about The Stones.
Sure, he went a bit far but i find it strange that the poster who called him a paedophile is still allowed to post on this board. I find the term he used repulsive in every way.

Ok..back to complaints thread. Having listened to the entire Hamburg show i can safely say Keith, in particular, was virtually incapable of stringing 2 decent notes together. Its actually sad to listen to.
I'll give him the benefit of the doubt as it is the first show, but he would need to improve a bit to make these shows a pleasant listening experience.

What did you think of his UMT-solo?

Quote
Eleanor Rigby

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
Eleanor Rigby
Yes...
But i would argue being called a paedophile is a bit worse that a person making critical comments about The Stones.
Sure, he went a bit far but i find it strange that the poster who called him a paedophile is still allowed to post on this board. I find the term he used repulsive in every way.

Ok..back to complaints thread. Having listened to the entire Hamburg show i can safely say Keith, in particular, was virtually incapable of stringing 2 decent notes together. Its actually sad to listen to.
I'll give him the benefit of the doubt as it is the first show, but he would need to improve a bit to make these shows a pleasant listening experience.

What did you think of his UMT-solo?

I didnt think much of it to be honest.
His playing throughout the song was safe (and nice) and his solo consisted of about 4 notes...which admittedly did not sound "wrong", but it also didnt reach any great heights.
By all reports KR seems to have picked up a bit since Hamburg.
More later !

Quote
Eleanor Rigby
Without a doubt!
Perhaps he was "warmed up" by UMT and could actually play some nice sounding chords and hold a solo.
But he is battling like most over-70 people do.

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
Eleanor Rigby
Without a doubt!
Perhaps he was "warmed up" by UMT and could actually play some nice sounding chords and hold a solo.
But he is battling like most over-70 people do.

Looks like his energy and/or imagination comes in waves. Because all of a sudden he plays fast runst (yes, even in the right key ), and other times he struggles with much simpler stuff.