For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
latvianinexile
Playing Lady Jane
You might have me there 71Tele but i'll do a little more research. Because when i saw Taylor in 88 in Hollywood he was using a Marshall at the Pallidino club.And Beck is usually using clean amps like the Stones.Quote
latvianinexileQuote
stonesfrkkDon't worry 71Tele, I'm sure it was alot better. Looking at Stellea Mcartney's photo, there was no Marshall on the stage. When everybody is playing really clean amps like the tweed's and vibro king's you don't come out with a marshall,that was part of MT problem with the over kill.Sorry to say i was actually really nice about MT performance but i do know the Taylor freaks very well,I lived with one for 10 years, it's nothing but tunnel vision,it's all about Taylor and that's it bottom line like someone said in one of the threads the Taylor freak is a whole other animal all together. It's actually very sad you MT freaks are all the same it's all about him and no body else.Don't get me wrong i love the Tayor area, but it's not all about Taylor look were he is in his career according to where the Stones are. It's a no brainer,Keef rules and that's about how the story of the Stones is. MT is a hired hand that plays really good leads and at that period in time it was perfect for the Stones with all the guitar wars going on in those days. The Stones are brillant at all the moves they have made through out the years MT would of never made it in the mid to late seventies are concerned with the punk movement Woody was the perfect replacement Sorry MT fanatics that's the way it rolls!Quote
71Tele
How was Rambler compared to Sunday?
There was no Marshall amp on the stage because there was no Jeff Beck tonight. Nothing to do with Taylor.
Quote
stonesfrkkDon't worry 71Tele, I'm sure it was alot better. Looking at Stellea Mcartney's photo, there was no Marshall on the stage. When everybody is playing really clean amps like the tweed's and vibro king's you don't come out with a marshall,that was part of MT problem with the over kill.Sorry to say i was actually really nice about MT performance but i do know the Taylor freaks very well,I lived with one for 10 years, it's nothing but tunnel vision,it's all about Taylor and that's it bottom line like someone said in one of the threads the Taylor freak is a whole other animal all together. It's actually very sad you MT freaks are all the same it's all about him and no body else.Don't get me wrong i love the Tayor area, but it's not all about Taylor look were he is in his career according to where the Stones are. It's a no brainer,Keef rules and that's about how the story of the Stones is. MT is a hired hand that plays really good leads and at that period in time it was perfect for the Stones with all the guitar wars going on in those days. The Stones are brillant at all the moves they have made through out the years MT would of never made it in the mid to late seventies are concerned with the punk movement Woody was the perfect replacement Sorry MT fanatics that's the way it rolls!Quote
71Tele
How was Rambler compared to Sunday?
Quote
latvianinexile
Playing Lady Jane
Quote
sjs12
What amp was Taylor using?
Allright i'll let you relish in your enjoyment because you deserve it i actually enjoyed parts of it too believe it or not! sorry about the explanation point.Quote
71TeleQuote
stonesfrkkDon't worry 71Tele, I'm sure it was alot better. Looking at Stellea Mcartney's photo, there was no Marshall on the stage. When everybody is playing really clean amps like the tweed's and vibro king's you don't come out with a marshall,that was part of MT problem with the over kill.Sorry to say i was actually really nice about MT performance but i do know the Taylor freaks very well,I lived with one for 10 years, it's nothing but tunnel vision,it's all about Taylor and that's it bottom line like someone said in one of the threads the Taylor freak is a whole other animal all together. It's actually very sad you MT freaks are all the same it's all about him and no body else.Don't get me wrong i love the Tayor area, but it's not all about Taylor look were he is in his career according to where the Stones are. It's a no brainer,Keef rules and that's about how the story of the Stones is. MT is a hired hand that plays really good leads and at that period in time it was perfect for the Stones with all the guitar wars going on in those days. The Stones are brillant at all the moves they have made through out the years MT would of never made it in the mid to late seventies are concerned with the punk movement Woody was the perfect replacement Sorry MT fanatics that's the way it rolls!Quote
71Tele
How was Rambler compared to Sunday?
Really, save all those completely unoriginal opinions for the next Taylor/Wood debate. I am simply enjoying Taylor playing with the band again.
Quote
sjs12
By the way, they played pretty much the same set every night on the 72/73 tours. Why do people not complain about that?
I asked inside hat kind of tickets they had to offer and they told me 700£ in the lower tiers.Quote
latvianinexile
Tickets available today at this ticket outlet at Picadilly Circus. Chuck will be replaced by Rick Wakeman on Thursday
j
One thing though 71Tele unoriginal opinions? Then who's opinions are they? Are you a phychic now? What's your 800 number?Quote
71TeleQuote
stonesfrkkDon't worry 71Tele, I'm sure it was alot better. Looking at Stellea Mcartney's photo, there was no Marshall on the stage. When everybody is playing really clean amps like the tweed's and vibro king's you don't come out with a marshall,that was part of MT problem with the over kill.Sorry to say i was actually really nice about MT performance but i do know the Taylor freaks very well,I lived with one for 10 years, it's nothing but tunnel vision,it's all about Taylor and that's it bottom line like someone said in one of the threads the Taylor freak is a whole other animal all together. It's actually very sad you MT freaks are all the same it's all about him and no body else.Don't get me wrong i love the Tayor area, but it's not all about Taylor look were he is in his career according to where the Stones are. It's a no brainer,Keef rules and that's about how the story of the Stones is. MT is a hired hand that plays really good leads and at that period in time it was perfect for the Stones with all the guitar wars going on in those days. The Stones are brillant at all the moves they have made through out the years MT would of never made it in the mid to late seventies are concerned with the punk movement Woody was the perfect replacement Sorry MT fanatics that's the way it rolls!Quote
71Tele
How was Rambler compared to Sunday?
Really, save all those completely unoriginal opinions for the next Taylor/Wood debate. I am simply enjoying Taylor playing with the band again.
Quote
mnewman505
Pete Townshend onstage last weekend @ The Who concert I saw in Detroit "thank you for coming out and spending your hard earned money to see us, we really appreciate it"
Mick Jagger onstage tonight at the O2 "hahahaha suckers!!!"
Remember the Licks Tour when you didn't know what the next song was going to be and you could actually afford a ticket? ahhhh those were the days!
Quote
stonesfrkkDon't worry 71Tele, I'm sure it was alot better. Looking at Stellea Mcartney's photo, there was no Marshall on the stage. When everybody is playing really clean amps like the tweed's and vibro king's you don't come out with a marshall,that was part of MT problem with the over kill.Sorry to say i was actually really nice about MT performance but i do know the Taylor freaks very well,I lived with one for 10 years, it's nothing but tunnel vision,it's all about Taylor and that's it bottom line like someone said in one of the threads the Taylor freak is a whole other animal all together. It's actually very sad you MT freaks are all the same it's all about him and no body else.Don't get me wrong i love the Tayor area, but it's not all about Taylor look were he is in his career according to where the Stones are. It's a no brainer,Keef rules and that's about how the story of the Stones is. MT is a hired hand that plays really good leads and at that period in time it was perfect for the Stones with all the guitar wars going on in those days. The Stones are brillant at all the moves they have made through out the years MT would of never made it in the mid to late seventies are concerned with the punk movement Woody was the perfect replacement Sorry MT fanatics that's the way it rolls!Quote
71Tele
How was Rambler compared to Sunday?
Hey Peter how are you? Did you go to this show?Quote
rrronnieI asked inside hat kind of tickets they had to offer and they told me 700£ in the lower tiers.Quote
latvianinexile
Tickets available today at this ticket outlet at Picadilly Circus. Chuck will be replaced by Rick Wakeman on Thursday
j
Quote
stonesfrkkOne thing though 71Tele unoriginal opinions? Then who's opinions are they? Are you a phychic now? What's your 800 number?Quote
71TeleQuote
stonesfrkkDon't worry 71Tele, I'm sure it was alot better. Looking at Stellea Mcartney's photo, there was no Marshall on the stage. When everybody is playing really clean amps like the tweed's and vibro king's you don't come out with a marshall,that was part of MT problem with the over kill.Sorry to say i was actually really nice about MT performance but i do know the Taylor freaks very well,I lived with one for 10 years, it's nothing but tunnel vision,it's all about Taylor and that's it bottom line like someone said in one of the threads the Taylor freak is a whole other animal all together. It's actually very sad you MT freaks are all the same it's all about him and no body else.Don't get me wrong i love the Tayor area, but it's not all about Taylor look were he is in his career according to where the Stones are. It's a no brainer,Keef rules and that's about how the story of the Stones is. MT is a hired hand that plays really good leads and at that period in time it was perfect for the Stones with all the guitar wars going on in those days. The Stones are brillant at all the moves they have made through out the years MT would of never made it in the mid to late seventies are concerned with the punk movement Woody was the perfect replacement Sorry MT fanatics that's the way it rolls!Quote
71Tele
How was Rambler compared to Sunday?
Really, save all those completely unoriginal opinions for the next Taylor/Wood debate. I am simply enjoying Taylor playing with the band again.
Quote
sjs12
Hoping for a tour next year.
Quote
steel driving hammerQuote
sjs12
Hoping for a tour next year.
"We see ya next year, bye bye..."
Mick Jagger 1981...America.
Quote
Lorenz
Mick T was cool on Rambler, some really good bits and he seemed concentrated. Seemed to absolutely love being on stage.
Quote
Rokyfan
so how was Wakeman, nobody has said? An impovement over Chuck?