Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Vanity Fair compares NY Post "Page Six" editors to the Stones
Posted by: The Joker ()
Date: December 27, 2004 03:14

Vanity Fair depicts the successive New York Post "Page Six" editors' profiles in its December issue. During 27 years of gossips crème de la crème (and still more coming), it appears "Page Six" had one "Keith" and one "Charlie";

Brady's successor, Neil Travis, was a bon vivant in the making and a favored member of the Murdoch mafia despite his openly liberal tendencies. If the flamboyant Dunleavy was the Keith Richards of tabloid journalism, then his mate Travis was its Charlie Watts, quieter and more thoughtful by comparison, but, nonetheless, a man who lived for the beat – whether it was Elaine's, Regine's, or Studio 54 – and the opportunity to cut down some tall puppies.


Re: Vanity Fair compares NY Post "Page Six" editors to the Stones
Date: December 27, 2004 09:29

Sweeties Darling, being a true blue American, let me tell you that Page Six is beere piss, it's flapsnot, it's it matter exposed when the foreskin is pulled back from an uncircumcised and unwashed penis. It's meaningless and Page Three of The London Sun...

"The wonder of Jimi Hendrix was that he could stand up at all he was so pumped full of drugs." Patsy, Patsy Stone

Re: Vanity Fair compares NY Post "Page Six" editors to the Stones
Posted by: The Joker ()
Date: December 27, 2004 11:32

Dear Menace.

On a neutral point of view, I presume you react exactly how they want you to react.


Editor Neil Travis used to say "there is no good day if no one is pissed off"



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 261
Record Number of Users: 184 on May 17, 2018 22:46
Record Number of Guests: 4101 on December 24, 2020 10:57

Previous page Next page First page IORR home