For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
gotdablouse
Yeah with Danger Up Ahead but it surfaced much later, like in 2005, I doubt that's the one Hoffmann had in mind in 1991, besides I've heard that snippet mentioned elsewhere but haven't heard it though.
Quote
gotdablouse
Yeah Karnbach broke the news in his 1997 book, he either had access to studio logs or to the actual songs...unfortunately the tapes never circulated (hence the "unverified" ), only the tracks mentioned by D.Hoffmanm as early as 1991 in Das Weissbuch (Giving it Up, Ready Yourself and For Your Precious Love) finally did in 2006 after a cassette once owned by a roadie got converted to .wav. The guy who posted it (think he said he was given the tape by the widow of the roadie) said he had more but he never surfaced again...maybe a few calls were made.
Another unbooted song from these sessions is "Gangster's Moll" but I understand a snippet circulated among a small circle, as it was also mentioned by Hoffmann.
Quote
Doxa
That's interesting if true. Namely, I have alawys thought that The Stones have an agreement that if any Jagger or Richards original is somehow linked to the Rolling Stones sessions, it will be credited as Jagger-Richards (like "Lonely At the Top").
- Doxa
Quote
Munichhilton
The real question here is why didn't these songs de-surface.
Why?
Quote
KRiffhardQuote
gotdablouse
Yeah with Danger Up Ahead but it surfaced much later, like in 2005, I doubt that's the one Hoffmann had in mind in 1991, besides I've heard that snippet mentioned elsewhere but haven't heard it though.
Hi gotdablouse,
here is the song:
[www.firstpost.com]
Quote
MathijsQuote
Doxa
That's interesting if true. Namely, I have alawys thought that The Stones have an agreement that if any Jagger or Richards original is somehow linked to the Rolling Stones sessions, it will be credited as Jagger-Richards (like "Lonely At the Top").
- Doxa
If you spent 10 weeks in a studio there will be many sessions on just ideas with half the band. If that idea gets tossed before you really work on it you can do with it what you want. I understand Make No Mistake started with just Charlie and Keith during Undercover sessions for example.
Mathijs
Quote
DoxaQuote
MathijsQuote
Doxa
That's interesting if true. Namely, I have alawys thought that The Stones have an agreement that if any Jagger or Richards original is somehow linked to the Rolling Stones sessions, it will be credited as Jagger-Richards (like "Lonely At the Top").
- Doxa
If you spent 10 weeks in a studio there will be many sessions on just ideas with half the band. If that idea gets tossed before you really work on it you can do with it what you want. I understand Make No Mistake started with just Charlie and Keith during Undercover sessions for example.
Mathijs
I can see that but if the songs actually get to a stage that they are named (as titles that would be released some day) and thereby put to 'Stones archieves', I think that might mean that they are not "just ideas", but put more effort put into them. But probably that is not the case here. Perehaps they are just Jagger's ideas - if they are really basics for those songs! - he just fooled with, and didn't want to work further.
But it could be also that the old standard of sharing the credits didn't mean a shit for Jagger in 1992 any longer, no matter how Stones-related the songs originally were.
We are just guessing here. Which is fun.
- Doxa
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
DoxaQuote
MathijsQuote
Doxa
That's interesting if true. Namely, I have alawys thought that The Stones have an agreement that if any Jagger or Richards original is somehow linked to the Rolling Stones sessions, it will be credited as Jagger-Richards (like "Lonely At the Top").
- Doxa
If you spent 10 weeks in a studio there will be many sessions on just ideas with half the band. If that idea gets tossed before you really work on it you can do with it what you want. I understand Make No Mistake started with just Charlie and Keith during Undercover sessions for example.
Mathijs
I can see that but if the songs actually get to a stage that they are named (as titles that would be released some day) and thereby put to 'Stones archieves', I think that might mean that they are not "just ideas", but put more effort put into them. But probably that is not the case here. Perehaps they are just Jagger's ideas - if they are really basics for those songs! - he just fooled with, and didn't want to work further.
But it could be also that the old standard of sharing the credits didn't mean a shit for Jagger in 1992 any longer, no matter how Stones-related the songs originally were.
We are just guessing here. Which is fun.
- Doxa
It might be that the songs had no name/were sketches at the time, and that they were identified later by engineers/fans (for archives like Nico's)?
Quote
mrD
somehow Danger up Ahead reminds me of 1/2 a loaf. Or is this just me?
Quote
Rocky Dijon
The Jagger-Richards credit for songs reworked outside the band ended after Keith was listed as co-writer on "Lonely at the Top" on SHE'S THE BOSS. Keith was quite outspoken about this at the time (pretty sure the 1986 Musician cover story goes over this). Going forward if they took an idea and reworked it solo they no longer share a credit. The Jagger-Richards credit from that point on was reserved for Stones projects only.
Quote
StonesTodQuote
mrD
somehow Danger up Ahead reminds me of 1/2 a loaf. Or is this just me?
which half?
Quote
Rocky Dijon
Pretty sure it's the issue I noted with the five of them on the cover and the quote about if Mick tours solo, Keith will slit his throat. Happy times.

Quote
MathijsQuote
Doxa
That's interesting if true. Namely, I have alawys thought that The Stones have an agreement that if any Jagger or Richards original is somehow linked to the Rolling Stones sessions, it will be credited as Jagger-Richards (like "Lonely At the Top").
- Doxa
If you spent 10 weeks in a studio there will be many sessions on just ideas with half the band. If that idea gets tossed before you really work on it you can do with it what you want. I understand Make No Mistake started with just Charlie and Keith during Undercover sessions for example.
Mathijs
Quote
gotdablouse
@Mathijs - where did you read about "No Mistake" starting during the "UC sessions" ? In Elliott's new book possibly ? I have the first two versions from 1990 and 2002 and it wasn't mentioned but since he got Christ Kimsey's help for the third one maybe there is some fresh info in there.
Quote
KRiffhard
It's really pleasant to talk with you about outtakes, hidden gems and sessions!
I would like to ask you some questions:
- the song 'Breakin' was recorded during Undercover, Dirty Work or Talk is cheap sessions? Do you think it is an early version of 'How i wish'? I'm not very sure...
Quote
MunichhiltonQuote
KRiffhard
It's really pleasant to talk with you about outtakes, hidden gems and sessions!
I would like to ask you some questions:
- the song 'Breakin' was recorded during Undercover, Dirty Work or Talk is cheap sessions? Do you think it is an early version of 'How i wish'? I'm not very sure...
Absolutely...some of the main riffs are in there...
Quote
StonesTodQuote
MunichhiltonQuote
KRiffhard
It's really pleasant to talk with you about outtakes, hidden gems and sessions!
I would like to ask you some questions:
- the song 'Breakin' was recorded during Undercover, Dirty Work or Talk is cheap sessions? Do you think it is an early version of 'How i wish'? I'm not very sure...
Absolutely...some of the main riffs are in there...
could be just wishful thinking, though