For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Doxa
Hmmm.. you Emotionalbarbeque come and say stoppong the fight over fanhood, and then you claim that most of us are not 'real fans'. Very diplomatic.
But that said, I think you have a point. Quite many of us didn't have chances for 'authentic' first-hand fan experiences, when the Stones actually made history and dictated the zeitgeist. It is like reading history books now.
- Doxa
Quote
runaway
A Fan is An Enthiousiastic Admirer!
Doesn't say nothing about the Age
Doens't say nothing about how many concerts you visited
Doesn't say nothing about how many records you got
I know what they are but you don'tQuote
2000 LYFHQuote
runawayQuote
2000 LYFH
Honestman - Nice photos as always, but certainly no fans in any of those pictures. Keep trying, the true fan is out there somewhere, but where?
2000 LYFH,
No fans but how would you like to call them?
And how does a fan look like then towards you?
I know what they are not, but I don't know what they are! What was the question?
Quote
memphiscats
Great photos & fascinating discussion.
The upside of being a Rolling Stones fan.
Discussing the smallest detail with like-minded strangers who've started to feel like friends. And as chaotic as life gets, you can always put on your favorite Stones album and for a little while, all is right with the world. You foot taps out the beat and before you know it, you're smiling because the excitement and joy of their music rock together make things OK again.
As His Majesty pointed out, it's about connection. (sounds like a Stones song )
Lately it's a bit rough being a fan. We have to share them with so many. It's hurtful when you've spent time and energy loving something and to feel like that "something" might have rejected you. Point in case = Concert tix $$$$. But that doesn't matter because even the Stones themselves can't take away their music, the gifts they gave us cannot be rescinded.
That said, I'm proud to be a Stones fan.
I drink one right now CHEERS& PEACEQuote
2000 LYFHQuote
memphiscats
Great photos & fascinating discussion.
The upside of being a Rolling Stones fan.
Discussing the smallest detail with like-minded strangers who've started to feel like friends. And as chaotic as life gets, you can always put on your favorite Stones album and for a little while, all is right with the world. You foot taps out the beat and before you know it, you're smiling because the excitement and joy of their music rock together make things OK again.
As His Majesty pointed out, it's about connection. (sounds like a Stones song )
Lately it's a bit rough being a fan. We have to share them with so many. It's hurtful when you've spent time and energy loving something and to feel like that "something" might have rejected you. Point in case = Concert tix $$$$. But that doesn't matter because even the Stones themselves can't take away their music, the gifts they gave us cannot be rescinded.
That said, I'm proud to be a Stones fan.
Well said - I think we just found a fan, thank you. runaway is trying to convince me I don't know what a fan is. Well its right here
Quote
emotionalbarbecue
After reading the bitterness and whining and all...
Let's put it into perspective my friends...
Being purist....a real fan is a fan who knew the Stones since the sixties....
Those who get on the wagon from the 80's onwards....would not not really fans then. It does not matter if they got on the wagon becouse of biological reasons (you were born in late sixties or seventies...). I mean,..if by the time Undercover was released you were in kindergarten.....you lost everything related to stones....every piece of the real thing.
Subsequently the being a fan issue stems from reading books,watching videos, hearing recordings, bootlegs and more importantly imagination and fantasy (and experiences like writing in IORR!)....but not from real life...
So the concept FAN must be revised....and all people here giving lessons, lectures and telling of others....chill out...please.
Most of people who write (myself perhaps....who knows...AND OF COURSE most of the respected "experts" who think they are entitled to give lessons) here have not idea of NOTHING, NO F IDEA. nothing, nihil, nada, no (swear word here) IDEA....No one's to blame....but the longevity of this band and biology.The best ever existed.
Quote
Erik_SnowQuote
runaway
A Fan is An Enthiousiastic Admirer!
Doesn't say nothing about the Age
Doens't say nothing about how many concerts you visited
Doesn't say nothing about how many records you got
Right you are
Quote
KirkQuote
Doxa
Hmmm.. you Emotionalbarbeque come and say stoppong the fight over fanhood, and then you claim that most of us are not 'real fans'. Very diplomatic.
But that said, I think you have a point. Quite many of us didn't have chances for 'authentic' first-hand fan experiences, when the Stones actually made history and dictated the zeitgeist. It is like reading history books now.
- Doxa
Doxa, history books don't just tell stories of the past. They rearrange the past and past events according to the 'needs' of the time they are written. The past is an open book. The Stones in 1968 - whatever that means to different people - would be a whole different thing if the Stones retired in 1969, 1976 or whenever. New meanings are attached to 'the Stones' of 1968 as they go onstage in 2012. It is actually an issue of different levels of experience. First-hand experience is just a level of experience. The meaning of past events only partially is based on first-hand experiences. I know you understand what I mean, because I'm always reading your posts!
Quote
KirkQuote
Doxa
Hmmm.. you Emotionalbarbeque come and say stoppong the fight over fanhood, and then you claim that most of us are not 'real fans'. Very diplomatic.
But that said, I think you have a point. Quite many of us didn't have chances for 'authentic' first-hand fan experiences, when the Stones actually made history and dictated the zeitgeist. It is like reading history books now.
- Doxa
Doxa, history books don't just tell stories of the past. They rearrange the past and past events according to the 'needs' of the time they are written. The past is an open book. The Stones in 1968 - whatever that means to different people - would be a whole different thing if the Stones retired in 1969, 1976 or whenever. New meanings are attached to 'the Stones' of 1968 as they go onstage in 2012. It is actually an issue of different levels of experience. First-hand experience is just a level of experience. The meaning of past events only partially is based on first-hand experiences. I know you understand what I mean, because I'm always reading your posts!
Quote
DandelionPowderman
It's rather simple. Fans support the band, either by listening to the band's music or attending their shows.
Lots of people here are not supporting the Stones at all, on the contrary, they're criticizing everything they do. Even D&G is shite. Doing concerts are shite, they should have packed it up long time ago...
If they play in stadiums, that's wrong. If they play in arenas, it's too expensive (which is indeed true, though).
Sometimes I wonder what the Stones can do, that these "fans" will accept...
Hey, some jerk here even thought I was disqualified to bring my opinion about music in general, because I said the Stones was my favourite band, and that D & G was the best rock track released this year
Quote
DoxaQuote
DandelionPowderman
It's rather simple. Fans support the band, either by listening to the band's music or attending their shows.
Lots of people here are not supporting the Stones at all, on the contrary, they're criticizing everything they do. Even D&G is shite. Doing concerts are shite, they should have packed it up long time ago...
If they play in stadiums, that's wrong. If they play in arenas, it's too expensive (which is indeed true, though).
Sometimes I wonder what the Stones can do, that these "fans" will accept...
Hey, some jerk here even thought I was disqualified to bring my opinion about music in general, because I said the Stones was my favourite band, and that D & G was the best rock track released this year
I think you do a little generalization error here, Dandy. Some people critizise some things, others some others, but I don't think there is one person who critizises everything. No, I think all of them love something very deeply in this band, that's why they are here, and that is what makes all of them fans.
By the way, I never have liked the very word "fan" - and the idea of arguing if someone likes something more than someone else does is really a dumb idea. "Hey, I am bigger fan of Marianne F's tits than you are!" "No, no, you really don't know what they mean to me!".
- Doxa
Quote
MartinB
I must have seen several hundreds of bands, famous and not famous. But even in the most decadent the Vegas era (I did not experience the 60s or 70s), no other band's music has ever managed to elicit the same emotions in me as the stones. Perhaps only one or two songs in a show, but despite being old, greedy and sometimes almost a parody of themeselves, their music is unimitable. It is not logical or rational. Is this being a fan?
Quote
Doxa on October 22, 2012, 10:43
Quote
71Tele
Where can I return my "real fan" badge to?
Quote
71Tele
Where can I return my "real fan" badge to?