For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Don't know about the hilarious, but dead-on it is.Quote
dcbaQuote
Mathijs
Short review of the show…score’s 1 to 5. 1 is unlistenable, 5 is 70’s Stones at their peak.
Mathijs
This review is hilarious... and dead-on!
Quote
otonneau
These guys are REALLY playing, I don't think they're going through the numbers at all, contrary to what many say on here. Sure, from 89 onwards they raised their level of professionalism so all shows were very strong and a kick for all who were there I'm sure, as opposed to the hit-and-miss of previous years. But you can still hear, from the small tidbits thrown here and there, that on some nights they not only do it; they love doing it. Tokyo 1990 is one of these shows when it is obvious to me that the band is enjoying PLAYING MUSIC, whereas often they seem to play music as a means of being onstage, which is what they love.
I don't understand the outcries at this release. It's one of the strongest shows of one of the strongest incarnations of the band. It sure has aged quite a bit, but it's still an excellent snapshot of a defining moment in the band's existence.
Quote
WhaleDon't know about the hilarious, but dead-on it is.Quote
dcbaQuote
Mathijs
Short review of the show…score’s 1 to 5. 1 is unlistenable, 5 is 70’s Stones at their peak.
Mathijs
This review is hilarious... and dead-on!
Quote
otonneau
After THAT, the time when you could come onstage dressed as an american footballer with a hoarse voice and play 10 minute versions of noodlin' on two chords (Just My Imagination) was OVER - at least if you're gonna boast being "the greatest rock n' roll in the world". The Stones HAD to up their game and they did: 89-90 shows are a huge party machine, you could dance on that stuff. And the times were all about having a party, not about fighting in the streets; and the Stones were NOT rebels anymore and didn't pretend. They did everything right at the time, and the fact that we cannot stand the sound of synthetizers anymore is irrelevant. And, there is still a lot of light-hearted fun to get from recordings such as this one.
Quote
shadooby
For those of you wondering as I was, I have downloaded and this is without a doubt the exact same shaow as Cold Steel Blue but with less treble and more bass. Personally I prefer CSB and if I'd have known would not have bought it.
Quote
StonesTodQuote
shadooby
For those of you wondering as I was, I have downloaded and this is without a doubt the exact same show as Cold Steel Blue but with less treble and more bass. Personally I prefer CSB and if I'd have known would not have bought it.
wasn't there a money-back-no-questions-asked guarantee??
Quote
shadoobyQuote
StonesTodQuote
shadooby
For those of you wondering as I was, I have downloaded and this is without a doubt the exact same show as Cold Steel Blue but with less treble and more bass. Personally I prefer CSB and if I'd have known would not have bought it.
wasn't there a money-back-no-questions-asked guarantee??
Guess if I'd done it the illegal way it would not have bugged me so much...oh well.
Quote
Mathijs
Short review of the show…score’s 1 to 5. 1 is unlistenable, 5 is 70’s Stones at their peak.
- Start Me Up: Nice opener, better than in ’82, but too clean for my taste. 2
- Bitch: Nice version! Fast and raw, guitar driven and not too brass driven. 3
- Sad Sad Sad: Totally forgettable. 1
- Harlem Shuffle: very, very nice groove, great bass, some nice guitar work. 4
- Tumbling Dice: Solid performance, but boring as hell. But it does show what the Stones miss since Wyman left: swing and groove. 2
- Miss You: un-listenable, even though tempo and guitars are better than any version since ’94. But those keyboards man….1
- Ruby Tuesday: Never been a favorite of mine, but I like Richards’ acoustic even though they turned it into a schmaltzy sing-along. And what a dreadful fake recorder that is…2
- Almost Hear You Sigh: very, very nice. Excellent guitars, Jagger’s vocals are great. 4
- Rock And A Hard Place. The new songs are much more interesting than the old ones, again nice guitar work, especially Richards is on fire. Never heard those Spanish licks before! 4
- Mixed Emotions: Nice version, nice tempo, quite raw and back to basic. Spoiled by awful horns on the ending. 3
- Honky Tonk Women: this adds absolutely nothing at all. I don’t think I’ll ever need to hear this song again. 1
- Midnight Rambler: Any version of Rambler is nice. Watts is fantastic, and again Wyman is sorely missed. But it doesn’t hold a candle to LA 75. The danger is gone. 3
- You Can’t Always Get What You Want: Horrible. Vegas style sing-a-long for the masses. 2
- Can’t Be Seen: totally forgettable, and a mess. 1
- Happy: I just don’t ever need to listen to this version, or any version after ’78, again. 1
- Paint It Black: Nice, I like Richards guitar, and it’s played fast. Watts and Wyman are on fire. 4
- 2000 Light Years From Home: best track of the set, just really good. Dark and dangerous, Richards is fantastic. It would be a 5, but it gets a 4 due to the horrid outro with that horrid synth guitar solo.
- Sympathy For The Devil: Next please. 1
- Gimme Shelter: it’s better than any version since 94 due to the faster tempo, and Richards and Wood actually playing. 3
- It’s Only Rock’n Roll: good up-tempo version, nice guitars. Just some good, professional latter day Stones. 3
- Brown Sugar. If I want to listen to Brown Sugar I’ll listen to a ’72 or ’75 version. Next please. 2
- Satisfaction: The 90’s version of Satisfaction where probably the best versions they have ever done (if we forget the ’69 MSG versions…). Nice tempo, grooving bass and great guitars. Still, the synths make it all very music-for-the-masses, like a tuxedo band on a wedding. I wouldn’t have been surprised if the next track would have been ‘Paradise by the Dashboard Light’. 4
- Jumping Jack Flash: Nice version. Very professional. Tad too slick. 3
So, what do we have: latter day, very professional Stones, bordering on being too slick and professional. When the brass and synths come in they cross that border, but when these are kept to a minimum they actually sound like a good band. Interesting is that, as with all tours after this one, only the new songs seem to be interesting, and seem to make especially Wood and Richards focus. With the older songs they just go on automatic, but with the new songs they seem to concentrate more and better. Rock and a Hard Place will always be a mediocre song, but all are working hard to make it something special. I guess after a few days this release will be put back into the archive, only to be listened to once in a year, whereas something like LA 75 gets a spin a couple of times per week. That’s the difference a fantastic band, and a professional band.
Mathijs
Quote
Munichhilton
Don't know if its been mentioned, but I did listen (finally) and the ARCHIVE release is more complete than the bootleg versions of TOKYO 1990. It must've been edited for the TV broadcast.
SFTD is almost 2 full minutes longer with Keith solos on the ARCHIVE release for instance.
It turns out to still be from 1990 though...just longer
Quote
Munichhilton
Yeah Flashpoint SFTD is from the 26th too, but I'm pretty sure most of Flashpoint is edited/overdubbed in some way.
The archive has it more raw. Kind of cool, for 1990.
Quote
Erik_SnowQuote
Munichhilton
Yeah Flashpoint SFTD is from the 26th too, but I'm pretty sure most of Flashpoint is edited/overdubbed in some way.
The archive has it more raw. Kind of cool, for 1990.
More "raw" but still very slick
Quote
Erik_Snow
Some official clips now up on the popular youtube
Here's one with a great still-picture - of the stone face
Quote
MunichhiltonQuote
Erik_Snow
Some official clips now up on the popular youtube
Here's one with a great still-picture - of the stone face
Ahhhhh the stone face.
I always wondered how the Stones got there name.
Is there nothing Bill can't do?
Quote
shadoobyQuote
StonesTodQuote
shadooby
For those of you wondering as I was, I have downloaded and this is without a doubt the exact same show as Cold Steel Blue but with less treble and more bass. Personally I prefer CSB and if I'd have known would not have bought it.
wasn't there a money-back-no-questions-asked guarantee??
Guess if I'd done it the illegal way it would not have bugged me so much...oh well.
Quote
CousinCQuote
shadoobyQuote
StonesTodQuote
shadooby
For those of you wondering as I was, I have downloaded and this is without a doubt the exact same show as Cold Steel Blue but with less treble and more bass. Personally I prefer CSB and if I'd have known would not have bought it.
wasn't there a money-back-no-questions-asked guarantee??
Guess if I'd done it the illegal way it would not have bugged me so much...oh well.
Really, imo there's much too much criticism!
Whether one likes a certain tour or boot is one thing, - and i'd vote for 60/70's material anytime for shure.
But see all these Stones releases in the last few years. What is there to grumble at? Particularly with these prices!
When I think about all those lots of money I/we spent on terrible bootlegs! Now we get complete, good quality shows for just a few bucks and there is more to come for shure. So a few releases I don't like too much don't really worry me.
Quote
muenke
I don´t get the "reason" for this release, there is so much better/interesting stuff in the vaults. Perhaps it´s a special thing for the japanse market, as our japanese friends (hi!) always have some special stuff (would love to buy the LSTNT-BluRay in europe ...
Quote
RobertJohnson
I recommend highly to you to download "Seventh of July" from our mate stonesmuziekfan. He is the "better Clearmountain" by far. Thank you very much for your great work, stonesmuziekfan:
[www.iorr.org]
Quote
CousinC
I think they keep a lot of the good stuff for the years after.