For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
No he wasnt caught. If so ...then present the evidence... it is simple.Quote
otonneau
They tested him... and re-tested him... and applied different valid methods... and he got caught. Now believe what you wish! No point in prolonging this.
You would be better off ignoring my posts... and I will ignore yours... and we will get along fine... and yeah I am still kind of pissed about how you started trouble with me last time, and when you got an appropriate reply you reported me to get me banned. I have since avoided you, please do the same.Quote
stonesrule
Max, if you'd stop living for TV and the internet...if you really care about Lance Armstrong and the other cyclists...the very factual story in the New York Times might open your eyes and make you less snippy with some of the posters here who actually have feelings.
Lance Armstrong was a fine athlete who blew it. I like to think he is sincere about the work he's done for cancer but you can't always beat the law and the rules of the game no matter what nice things you do. Sincerity really does count in this world.
...until proven guilty. Personally I like that policy, maybe some dont.Quote
Stoneage
Armstrong, innocent? Yeah, sure, they all are....
Quote
otonneau
Max, you clutch at two straws: Armstrong not having been tested and the UCI not having (yet) taken away the trophies. These straws are not strong enough because
Quote
otonneau
Oh no it's not the top of the list - politics and economics being off-limit on this board I cannot number my priorities. Armstrong comes maybe at number 25 000 on that list. But if we discuss Armstrong, then let's do it rationally and face facts. Now, I could return your point: there is so much shit going on, so many people being cheated and robbed - of their home, their jobs, their basic rights, their life saving - it's amazing that it comes top of the list to defend a rich cheat, dont't you think?