Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: Previous123Next
Current Page: 2 of 3
Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: treaclefingers ()
Date: March 28, 2012 05:30

Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
whitem8
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
..... ""I do not think Motley Crue should be in. They did nothing original that hadn't been done before, had little commercial success, and appeal or popularity""....

Yeah.... Mötley Crüe only sold 80 million albums worldwide, with such limited sales how could they possibly be considered for any HOF?

Ok, yeah, that wasn't written as well as it should have been. I apologize for that miss information. But I do think they didn't do anything new or original that would merit them in a real RARHOF. Plus they are absolutely horrid!

Mötley Crüe is more legit than this sham that calls itself a RNRHOF. I think it is fine if you hate Mötley Crüe, but there is no sense saying they did not, and still do, have wide appeal.

OK, now my uncomfortable feeling that Max likes Motley Crue is increasing.

I have a really good sense for these things.

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: March 28, 2012 05:31

Quote
treaclefingers
I get this uncomfortable feeling....
As you said, just turn that man thong around, and your problem is solved winking smiley

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: March 28, 2012 05:34

Oh LQQK!!!!
Another RNRHALLOFSHAME thread hits two pages... maybe we should bump another one of the 15-20 threads like this... maybe fill the whole front page with them.

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: treaclefingers ()
Date: March 28, 2012 05:35

Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
treaclefingers
I get this uncomfortable feeling....
As you said, just turn that man thong around, and your problem is solved winking smiley

I've resorted to just removing it altogether...more of a footloose and fancy free approach!

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: MJG196 ()
Date: March 28, 2012 05:35

Quote
whitem8
I do not think Motley Crue should be in. They did nothing original that hadn't been done before.

This is really funny, especially as it is posted on a Rolling Stones forum.

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: March 28, 2012 05:37

Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
treaclefingers
I get this uncomfortable feeling....
As you said, just turn that man thong around, and your problem is solved winking smiley

I've resorted to just removing it altogether...more of a footloose and fancy free approach!

oh man... again with the TMI winking smiley

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: treaclefingers ()
Date: March 28, 2012 05:50

Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
treaclefingers
I get this uncomfortable feeling....
As you said, just turn that man thong around, and your problem is solved winking smiley

I've resorted to just removing it altogether...more of a footloose and fancy free approach!

oh man... again with the TMI winking smiley

I'm taking my nipples and going home if you're going to get all 'attitudinal' on me!

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: March 28, 2012 05:52

Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
treaclefingers
I get this uncomfortable feeling....
As you said, just turn that man thong around, and your problem is solved winking smiley

I've resorted to just removing it altogether...more of a footloose and fancy free approach!

oh man... again with the TMI winking smiley

I'm taking my nipples and going home if you're going to get all 'attitudinal' on me!
LOL

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: SweetThing ()
Date: March 28, 2012 06:11

Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
SweetThing
Quote
Munichhilton
Quote
hbwriter
I think RUSH is the most glaring omission, actually

I think so too.
Who doesn't know the words to "Tom Sawyer"?
Several extremely successful American tours as well, including last year.

Not a fan of that song, and I don't know all the lyrics either; always change the station.

But I do like Spirit of Radio though. spinning smiley sticking its tongue out

Is it because they are Canadian maybe? Ugly?

I vote they should be voted in regardless but I think that's because I'm generally a nice person.

Once all these guys get in, we'll have to start feeling bad for Corey Heart and REO Speedwagon etc.

Nothing stopping some run of the mill "Classic" Rock station from having a "Rocktober" fundraiser to build their own shrine to their fossilized format's playlist -

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: MidnightLurker ()
Date: March 28, 2012 06:24

The J. Geils Band should be in for sure. Saw them last Summer and those guys still can ROCK! Huge catalogue of fantastic songs. Much better than a lot of acts already in.

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: whitem8 ()
Date: March 28, 2012 07:14

J Giles should be in for sure, another reason the hall of fame is a joke. Next thing they will admit Berry Manilow.

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: tomk ()
Date: March 28, 2012 07:40

Jann Wenner and his henchmen control all this. Wenner's still living in 1968.

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: backstreetboy1 ()
Date: March 28, 2012 08:00

the turtles,the most overlooked group.one of ,if not americas biggest 60's band.

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: Glam Descendant ()
Date: March 28, 2012 08:06

>This place is unworthy of anyone's, outside of Cleveland, attention.

Then why are you discussing it?


>Oh LQQK!!!!
Another RNRHALLOFSHAME thread hits two pages... maybe we should bump another one of the 15-20 threads like this... maybe fill the whole front page with them.


You single-handedly contributed @ 10 posts to this thread! Subtract 9 of those and it would probably still be just a single page.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-28 08:07 by Glam Descendant.

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: Come On ()
Date: March 28, 2012 08:24

Kiss and Motley Crue should be inducted in places like 'Pose-Rock and Roll Hall of FAme...They think they ROCK but....it's just poses of for example real rocking bands like The Rolling Stones...or Ramones...or The Clash...or Canned Heat...or Creedence Clearwater Revival...or The Kinks....

2 1 2 0

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: March 28, 2012 08:50

Quote
Glam Descendant
>This place is unworthy of anyone's, outside of Cleveland, attention.

Then why are you discussing it?


>Oh LQQK!!!!
Another RNRHALLOFSHAME thread hits two pages... maybe we should bump another one of the 15-20 threads like this... maybe fill the whole front page with them.


You single-handedly contributed @ 10 posts to this thread! Subtract 9 of those and it would probably still be just a single page.

Thanks for keeping track junior.... keep us posted on that...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-28 09:08 by Max'sKansasCity.

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: March 28, 2012 08:51

Quote
Come On
Kiss and Motley Crue should be inducted in places like 'Pose-Rock and Roll Hall of FAme...They think they ROCK but....it's just poses of for example real rocking bands like The Rolling Stones...or Ramones...or The Clash...or Canned Heat...or Creedence Clearwater Revival...or The Kinks....

Gotta laugh at people who are snooty about judging rock and roll.

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: Come On ()
Date: March 28, 2012 09:03

Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
Come On
Kiss and Motley Crue should be inducted in places like 'Pose-Rock and Roll Hall of FAme...They think they ROCK but....it's just poses of for example real rocking bands like The Rolling Stones...or Ramones...or The Clash...or Canned Heat...or Creedence Clearwater Revival...or The Kinks....

Gotta laugh at people who are snooty about judging rock and roll.

Very good, that was my purpose, a good laugh...grinning smiley

2 1 2 0

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: March 28, 2012 09:06

grinning smiley

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: whitem8 ()
Date: March 28, 2012 09:55

Not snooty, just disparaging towards posers and little talent.

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: March 28, 2012 10:07

Quote
whitem8
Not snooty, just disparaging towards posers and little talent.
No, it is snooty, defined as Snobbishly aloof; haughty.

"Little talent"? huh? As if playing certain types of Rock and roll takes much talent, while other types does not.... I got news... none of it takes makes much talent... and to see people mention some bands which they love (and deem deserving ) while dismissing others is 110% snooty.

As if any of these rock and roll bands are more deserving than others... that idea makes me laugh... it is just more of the "our gang BS"... more "us versus them"... and "ours is great, but your sucks"... it is just funny.

It is fine to not like his style, but anybody saying Mick Mars has little talent is 110% clueless.


EDIT-
Of course some rock and roll takes more talent, like Hendrix, VH etc does...
but most rock and roll is pretty simple stuff.


The main point is this RNRHOF thing in Cleveland is a sham and debating who should be in is meaningless at this point. The debate is over, they ruined it.... the well is poisoned



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-28 10:27 by Max'sKansasCity.

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Date: March 28, 2012 12:31

KISS are the biggest whores in the industry! They couldn't get themselves in the Hall with an blank cheque! Who can forget Gene's pathetic plug to the Hall at the end of the Symthony (typo error??) gig in Melbourne! Even if they did get in, it'll be an after thought, in which, in all probability Gene and Paul would accept as they have no dignity and no pride!

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: mr_c_ox ()
Date: March 28, 2012 14:17

This year the Crickets and James Browns old band are being inducted (among others) as backing bands that should have been inducted with there frontman. Why not the E Street Band as well?

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: GravityBoy ()
Date: March 28, 2012 14:21

You're either famaous or you're not.

The "hall of fame" is nonsense.

Who cares.

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: March 28, 2012 14:48



.............What about the Rock & Roll Hall Of FLAME ....



ROCKMAN

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Date: March 28, 2012 15:07

Kiss was one of the biggest rock acts of the 70s, and should definitely be in the RHOF.

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: Come On ()
Date: March 28, 2012 15:08

...or The Rock & Roll Hall of Lame...




2 1 2 0

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: Come On ()
Date: March 28, 2012 15:14

...or R&RHo Tame...



..Game



..Dame



2 1 2 0

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: buffalo7478 ()
Date: March 28, 2012 15:17

The Hall is a joke. I visited once and was thoroughly underwhelmed. Cleveland was fun...but the Hall is boring.

Admission to the Hall seems to have forgotten the 'Rock N Roll' part of the name, with a seeming bias toward influences rather than rockers.

Re: OT - Rock and Roll Hall of Fame snubs
Posted by: Elmo Lewis ()
Date: March 28, 2012 16:30

Tommy James and The Shondells
Cheap Trick

Both need to be in more than many who are there. It's a joke anyway.

Goto Page: Previous123Next
Current Page: 2 of 3


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 291
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 6295 on November 30, 2021 14:09

Previous page Next page First page IORR home