Tell Me :
Talk
sounds fitting. i think the fallen comrades should start this and honor themselves and we can take it from there...or something.
yes. we who care more about the stones relationships and how the band members look than the music....we certainly have our priorities in order. music, schmusic....
Ah yes, the Rolling Stones, my favourite boyband...
they're adorable, aren't they? don't you just wanna squeeze 'em all???
the never satisfied fans are the true fans and the only ones who really matter.
Hard for them to do if they are banned.
sigh. please. NOBODY is actually banned...just usernames...sheesh.
what percentage are, would you say?
Hard to say, but there seems to be a lot of em and they make any musical discussions about Brian hard going, as do those who despise the little fella.
and a new category is born...
Why?
It is true that there are Jones-era fans and Jones crackpot conspiracy theorists, and the Jones-era fans should not be confused with the other type. Personally, I love the Jones era. Or rather the two Jones era: The blues purist one and the pop one. Both great.
I'm sensitive...Jones Crackpot? Why no Keith Crackpots?
Wait...I've just come out of it.
I like the thread now. I'm glad we had this talk!
There are plenty of crackpots to go around. Where are the Charlie crackpots? Like I said, make your own categories to your heart's content. This is a democratic process.
That is a good summation of me.
My first Stones purchase was a box set -- Rolling Stones: Mick Taylor Years.
Greetings from the Jersey Shore.
That's a good idea. Some of the ones I would have put on there have come back, though: Sir Craven of Cottage, Honestman, stonerelics (or something like that).
Greetings from the Jersey Shore.
__________________________
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
StonesTod
()
Date: December 2, 2011 20:33
Quote
71TeleQuote
StonesTod
it occurs to me you've left out the single category with the largest representation:
the permanently banned
these are the posters who have been banned for bad behavior and now post under new identities.
yeah, sort of the graveyard. We should start a Memorial thread and honor our fallen comrades.
sounds fitting. i think the fallen comrades should start this and honor themselves and we can take it from there...or something.
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
stonesrule
()
Date: December 2, 2011 20:42
Thanks for including us ladies.
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
StonesTod
()
Date: December 2, 2011 20:43
Quote
stonesrule
Thanks for including us ladies.
yes. we who care more about the stones relationships and how the band members look than the music....we certainly have our priorities in order. music, schmusic....
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
Green Lady
()
Date: December 2, 2011 21:02
Quote
StonesTodQuote
stonesrule
Thanks for including us ladies.
yes. we who care more about the stones relationships and how the band members look than the music....we certainly have our priorities in order. music, schmusic....
Ah yes, the Rolling Stones, my favourite boyband...
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
StonesTod
()
Date: December 2, 2011 21:07
Quote
Green LadyQuote
StonesTodQuote
stonesrule
Thanks for including us ladies.
yes. we who care more about the stones relationships and how the band members look than the music....we certainly have our priorities in order. music, schmusic....
Ah yes, the Rolling Stones, my favourite boyband...
they're adorable, aren't they? don't you just wanna squeeze 'em all???
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
dcba
()
Date: December 2, 2011 21:12
15. The "I love to hate the band" fans.
Ppl prompt to point out everythng that's wrong with the band. From the handful of failed shows the band played, to Jagger's solos ventures, to Ron Wood's socks on the last tour, to the humongous sound level at Keith's 1992 gigs, to the 2011 overdubs on 1978 recordings... they're NEVER satisfied.
I'm afraid I fall into this category...
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2011-12-02 21:17 by dcba.
Ppl prompt to point out everythng that's wrong with the band. From the handful of failed shows the band played, to Jagger's solos ventures, to Ron Wood's socks on the last tour, to the humongous sound level at Keith's 1992 gigs, to the 2011 overdubs on 1978 recordings... they're NEVER satisfied.
I'm afraid I fall into this category...
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2011-12-02 21:17 by dcba.
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
StonesTod
()
Date: December 2, 2011 21:19
Quote
dcba
15. The "I love to hate the band" fans.
Ppl prompt to point out everythng that's wrong with the band. From the handful of failed shows the band played, to Jagger's solos ventures, to Ron Wood's socks on the last tour, to the humongous sound level at Keith's 1992 gigs, to the 2011 overdubs on 1978 recordings... they're NEVER satisfied.
I'm afraid I fall into this category...
the never satisfied fans are the true fans and the only ones who really matter.
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
71Tele
()
Date: December 2, 2011 21:48
Quote
StonesTodQuote
71TeleQuote
StonesTod
it occurs to me you've left out the single category with the largest representation:
the permanently banned
these are the posters who have been banned for bad behavior and now post under new identities.
yeah, sort of the graveyard. We should start a Memorial thread and honor our fallen comrades.
sounds fitting. i think the fallen comrades should start this and honor themselves and we can take it from there...or something.
Hard for them to do if they are banned.
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
Virgin Priest
()
Date: December 2, 2011 22:21
71Tele - you forgot one category: the Spanish-Tony-Believers!
Priest
Priest
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
jamesfdouglas
()
Date: December 2, 2011 23:00
What about the Hey, I've got my own band too inspired by The Stones - pleeeeease check them out!
[thepowergoats.com]
[thepowergoats.com]
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
StonesTod
()
Date: December 2, 2011 23:31
Quote
71TeleQuote
StonesTodQuote
71TeleQuote
StonesTod
it occurs to me you've left out the single category with the largest representation:
the permanently banned
these are the posters who have been banned for bad behavior and now post under new identities.
yeah, sort of the graveyard. We should start a Memorial thread and honor our fallen comrades.
sounds fitting. i think the fallen comrades should start this and honor themselves and we can take it from there...or something.
Hard for them to do if they are banned.
sigh. please. NOBODY is actually banned...just usernames...sheesh.
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: December 2, 2011 23:45
There needs to be a...
The Jonesites for fans who think the original Brian Jones era band was the best.
Not all those who specifically prefer the Jones era are crackpot conspiracy theory types. They may just prefer their stones without the flowery guitar hero solos of the Taylor era or the later disco infused comedy rock of the Wood era.
Good thread 71Tele.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2011-12-02 23:50 by His Majesty.
The Jonesites for fans who think the original Brian Jones era band was the best.
Not all those who specifically prefer the Jones era are crackpot conspiracy theory types. They may just prefer their stones without the flowery guitar hero solos of the Taylor era or the later disco infused comedy rock of the Wood era.
Good thread 71Tele.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2011-12-02 23:50 by His Majesty.
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
StonesTod
()
Date: December 2, 2011 23:47
Quote
His Majesty
Not all those who specifically prefer the Jones era are crackpot conspiracy theory types.
what percentage are, would you say?
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: December 2, 2011 23:54
Quote
StonesTodQuote
His Majesty
Not all those who specifically prefer the Jones era are crackpot conspiracy theory types.
what percentage are, would you say?
Hard to say, but there seems to be a lot of em and they make any musical discussions about Brian hard going, as do those who despise the little fella.
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
Munichhilton
()
Date: December 2, 2011 23:55
I've become offended by this thread.
Seriously and irreversible offended and put out.
and other stuff
Seriously and irreversible offended and put out.
and other stuff
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
StonesTod
()
Date: December 2, 2011 23:59
Quote
Munichhilton
Seriously and irreversible offended and put out.
and a new category is born...
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
71Tele
()
Date: December 3, 2011 01:06
Quote
Munichhilton
I've become offended by this thread.
Seriously and irreversible offended and put out.
and other stuff
Why?
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
71Tele
()
Date: December 3, 2011 01:08
Quote
His Majesty
There needs to be a...
The Jonesites for fans who think the original Brian Jones era band was the best.
Not all those who specifically prefer the Jones era are crackpot conspiracy theory types. They may just prefer their stones without the flowery guitar hero solos of the Taylor era or the later disco infused comedy rock of the Wood era.
Good thread 71Tele.
It is true that there are Jones-era fans and Jones crackpot conspiracy theorists, and the Jones-era fans should not be confused with the other type. Personally, I love the Jones era. Or rather the two Jones era: The blues purist one and the pop one. Both great.
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
Munichhilton
()
Date: December 3, 2011 01:22
Quote
71TeleQuote
Munichhilton
I've become offended by this thread.
Seriously and irreversible offended and put out.
and other stuff
Why?
I'm sensitive...Jones Crackpot? Why no Keith Crackpots?
Wait...I've just come out of it.
I like the thread now. I'm glad we had this talk!
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
NICOS
()
Date: December 3, 2011 01:32
Good point at #15
__________________________
__________________________
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
71Tele
()
Date: December 3, 2011 01:36
Quote
MunichhiltonQuote
71TeleQuote
Munichhilton
I've become offended by this thread.
Seriously and irreversible offended and put out.
and other stuff
Why?
I'm sensitive...Jones Crackpot? Why no Keith Crackpots?
Wait...I've just come out of it.
I like the thread now. I'm glad we had this talk!
There are plenty of crackpots to go around. Where are the Charlie crackpots? Like I said, make your own categories to your heart's content. This is a democratic process.
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
misterfrias
()
Date: December 3, 2011 01:41
Quote
71Tele
3. The Taylorites: People who believe the band was at its peak from 1969-1974.
That is a good summation of me.
My first Stones purchase was a box set -- Rolling Stones: Mick Taylor Years.
Greetings from the Jersey Shore.
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
misterfrias
()
Date: December 3, 2011 01:45
Quote
StonesTodQuote
71TeleQuote
StonesTod
it occurs to me you've left out the single category with the largest representation:
the permanently banned
these are the posters who have been banned for bad behavior and now post under new identities.
yeah, sort of the graveyard. We should start a Memorial thread and honor our fallen comrades.
sounds fitting. i think the fallen comrades should start this and honor themselves and we can take it from there...or something.
That's a good idea. Some of the ones I would have put on there have come back, though: Sir Craven of Cottage, Honestman, stonerelics (or something like that).
Greetings from the Jersey Shore.
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
SomeTorontoGirl
()
Date: December 3, 2011 04:43
Really? NOBODY else for Charlie? Show some love, people!
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
Green Lady
()
Date: December 3, 2011 11:08
#16: The Generous Posters of Downloads and Scanners of Publications - bless 'em all!
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
Green Lady
()
Date: December 3, 2011 11:32
#17 The Newbie: Hi! I'm new to this board. I'm going to collect a five-page thread of welcome messages and disappear forever.
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
Honestman
()
Date: December 3, 2011 12:26
#18 The Bootlegs Specialists they are a bunch here, the first that comes to mind is Erik Snow but there are some others and not to be forgotten the true lovers of the genuine thing for tryin' to remasterin' without downgrading some worthy tapes and this time Falo comes to mind and here too a special mention to Silkcut for bringin' us a few weeks ago his great collection of Vinyl Rip see "Hot Stuff section"
HMN
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2011-12-03 12:27 by Honestman.
HMN
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2011-12-03 12:27 by Honestman.
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
NICOS
()
Date: December 3, 2011 12:32
Quote
Green Lady
#17 The Newbie: Hi! I'm new to this board. I'm going to collect a five-page thread of welcome messages and disappear forever.
__________________________
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
6853
()
Date: December 3, 2011 12:48
2. The "True Fans": Everything the Rolling Stones has ever done is equally great. Dirty Work? As great as Exile. Vegas era? As great as 1972. Chuck? As great as Ian Stewart. It's all good. Any sentiment to the contrary is "negativity
that is me I guess
that is me I guess
Re: A (hopefully) Humorous Take on the Various Types on IORR
Posted by:
mikeeder
()
Date: December 3, 2011 13:38
1 and 10 for me.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
5strings , cyclist , DeadHead4Ever , dkwalika , frtylicks , georgelicks , gibsonman , hbwriter , hockenheim95 , Irix , JMARKO , maxgb , mikey C , niki , Nobbi82 , perkmo , StonedRambler , THE DON
Guests:
1862
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10