For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Bärs
I'm not a drummer but I don't think the change itself was crucial for the sound. The military grip looks cooler though and puts the Stones on a higher level than other rock bands. It connects the band with their roots in rhythm and blues, rock'n'roll and boogie woogie. Charlie himself is crucial for that connection.
Quote
seitan
I guess the main difference is that with the military grip it´s much harder to get really loud sounding drums - and that´s one of the reasons why Don Was recorded Charlie´s drums in a stairway for the voodoo lounge album to get bigger echo from the stairway and a louder drum sound. Charlie Watts is not a loud drummer - but he's got great swingin groove on every song, it's not just bang bang...
This might be one of the reasons why heavy metal drummers dont swing. They just go bang, bang, bang - it might be louder when you use "normal grip" but with a military grip technique it´s easier to play quiet also.
It's like how Keith says: " We play real music, not Metal."
Dave Ghrol of Foo Fighters/Nirvana said that it was really difficult for him to play really quiet on Nirvana's MTV Unplugged sessions due to his technigue. It's a matter of musical taste anyway..
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
seitan
I guess the main difference is that with the military grip it´s much harder to get really loud sounding drums - and that´s one of the reasons why Don Was recorded Charlie´s drums in a stairway for the voodoo lounge album to get bigger echo from the stairway and a louder drum sound. Charlie Watts is not a loud drummer - but he's got great swingin groove on every song, it's not just bang bang...
This might be one of the reasons why heavy metal drummers dont swing. They just go bang, bang, bang - it might be louder when you use "normal grip" but with a military grip technique it´s easier to play quiet also.
It's like how Keith says: " We play real music, not Metal."
Dave Ghrol of Foo Fighters/Nirvana said that it was really difficult for him to play really quiet on Nirvana's MTV Unplugged sessions due to his technigue. It's a matter of musical taste anyway..
I'm not a drummer myself, but the drummers I've worked with say the opposite.
On the snare, Charlie is a pretty loud drummer.
Quote
seitanQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
seitan
I guess the main difference is that with the military grip it´s much harder to get really loud sounding drums - and that´s one of the reasons why Don Was recorded Charlie´s drums in a stairway for the voodoo lounge album to get bigger echo from the stairway and a louder drum sound. Charlie Watts is not a loud drummer - but he's got great swingin groove on every song, it's not just bang bang...
This might be one of the reasons why heavy metal drummers dont swing. They just go bang, bang, bang - it might be louder when you use "normal grip" but with a military grip technique it´s easier to play quiet also.
It's like how Keith says: " We play real music, not Metal."
Dave Ghrol of Foo Fighters/Nirvana said that it was really difficult for him to play really quiet on Nirvana's MTV Unplugged sessions due to his technigue. It's a matter of musical taste anyway..
I'm not a drummer myself, but the drummers I've worked with say the opposite.
On the snare, Charlie is a pretty loud drummer.
"So I went back to the military grip, and I really do prefer
it, but because of the amount you ride on the hi-hat,
I suppose I got into the habit of pulling the other
stick out of the way to get a louder sound." - Charli Watts
Ok, this might be hard to explain..sorry, - Snare may sound loud - it´s the only drum you hear when Charlie hits it - the other stick is out of the way and theres a break in hi-hat, - That's what makes Charlie so unique. The reason he does it, is to get more volume, cause the military grip technique is not a loud technique for rock n roll. You are using mainly wrists and not the whole arm. Other drummers who use the military gripon the snare - dont pull the other stick out of the way from hi-hat, for the snare to be loud. The don't do that, cause military grip is not that popular in rock n roll..it´s not loud technique, it's more popular in jazz.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
seitanQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
seitan
I guess the main difference is that with the military grip it´s much harder to get really loud sounding drums - and that´s one of the reasons why Don Was recorded Charlie´s drums in a stairway for the voodoo lounge album to get bigger echo from the stairway and a louder drum sound. Charlie Watts is not a loud drummer - but he's got great swingin groove on every song, it's not just bang bang...
This might be one of the reasons why heavy metal drummers dont swing. They just go bang, bang, bang - it might be louder when you use "normal grip" but with a military grip technique it´s easier to play quiet also.
It's like how Keith says: " We play real music, not Metal."
Dave Ghrol of Foo Fighters/Nirvana said that it was really difficult for him to play really quiet on Nirvana's MTV Unplugged sessions due to his technigue. It's a matter of musical taste anyway..
I'm not a drummer myself, but the drummers I've worked with say the opposite.
On the snare, Charlie is a pretty loud drummer.
"So I went back to the military grip, and I really do prefer
it, but because of the amount you ride on the hi-hat,
I suppose I got into the habit of pulling the other
stick out of the way to get a louder sound." - Charli Watts
Ok, this might be hard to explain..sorry, - Snare may sound loud - it´s the only drum you hear when Charlie hits it - the other stick is out of the way and theres a break in hi-hat, - That's what makes Charlie so unique. The reason he does it, is to get more volume, cause the military grip technique is not a loud technique for rock n roll. You are using mainly wrists and not the whole arm. Other drummers who use the military gripon the snare - dont pull the other stick out of the way from hi-hat, for the snare to be loud. The don't do that, cause military grip is not that popular in rock n roll..it´s not loud technique, it's more popular in jazz.
Sounds very reasonable, imo, too. Still, there is the neverending dispute of what makes the hardest hit; the whole arm punch or the perfect technical wrist shot
Quote
MathijsQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
seitanQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
seitan
I guess the main difference is that with the military grip it´s much harder to get really loud sounding drums - and that´s one of the reasons why Don Was recorded Charlie´s drums in a stairway for the voodoo lounge album to get bigger echo from the stairway and a louder drum sound. Charlie Watts is not a loud drummer - but he's got great swingin groove on every song, it's not just bang bang...
This might be one of the reasons why heavy metal drummers dont swing. They just go bang, bang, bang - it might be louder when you use "normal grip" but with a military grip technique it´s easier to play quiet also.
It's like how Keith says: " We play real music, not Metal."
Dave Ghrol of Foo Fighters/Nirvana said that it was really difficult for him to play really quiet on Nirvana's MTV Unplugged sessions due to his technigue. It's a matter of musical taste anyway..
I'm not a drummer myself, but the drummers I've worked with say the opposite.
On the snare, Charlie is a pretty loud drummer.
"So I went back to the military grip, and I really do prefer
it, but because of the amount you ride on the hi-hat,
I suppose I got into the habit of pulling the other
stick out of the way to get a louder sound." - Charli Watts
Ok, this might be hard to explain..sorry, - Snare may sound loud - it´s the only drum you hear when Charlie hits it - the other stick is out of the way and theres a break in hi-hat, - That's what makes Charlie so unique. The reason he does it, is to get more volume, cause the military grip technique is not a loud technique for rock n roll. You are using mainly wrists and not the whole arm. Other drummers who use the military gripon the snare - dont pull the other stick out of the way from hi-hat, for the snare to be loud. The don't do that, cause military grip is not that popular in rock n roll..it´s not loud technique, it's more popular in jazz.
Sounds very reasonable, imo, too. Still, there is the neverending dispute of what makes the hardest hit; the whole arm punch or the perfect technical wrist shot
Well, the way Charlie uses it is that he does rim shots about 99% of the time -and rim shots are the loudest possible hits on a snare. Also, after 10 years of playing like Charlie you should have sufficient technique to play the snare as loudly as with standard grip. It's a bit like that 100 pound professional boxer knocking down a 250 pound amateur boxer because he has mastered the technique.
The military grip is crucial for the Stones -Watts started missing the fourth on the hi-hatt around '69/'70, and became a much more swinging drummer from that point.
Mathijs
Quote
marcovandereijk
In 1969 he didn't skip the 4th beat on the high hat, at least not during Little Queenie.
Quote
seitan
I guess the main difference is that with the military grip it´s much harder to get really loud sounding drums - and that´s one of the reasons why Don Was recorded Charlie´s drums in a stairway for the voodoo lounge album to get bigger echo from the stairway and a louder drum sound. Charlie Watts is not a loud drummer - but he's got great swingin groove on every song, it's not just bang bang...
This might be one of the reasons why heavy metal drummers dont swing. They just go bang, bang, bang - it might be louder when you use "normal grip" but with a military grip technique it´s easier to play quiet also.
It's like how Keith says: " We play real music, not Metal."
Dave Ghrol of Foo Fighters/Nirvana said that it was really difficult for him to play really quiet on Nirvana's MTV Unplugged sessions due to his technigue. It's a matter of musical taste anyway..
i agree. watch them do "rock me baby" and charlie is stiff as a board. i really hope they don't do a blues album.Quote
Palace Revolution 2000
I don't see it that Charlie swings more since he started omitting that hi-hat hit. Quite the opposite. what came with it was more of a sense of mechanical playing.
Quote
MathijsQuote
marcovandereijk
In 1969 he didn't skip the 4th beat on the high hat, at least not during Little Queenie.
That's why I said around '69. We've discussed this video before, and many people didn't see it then, but you see Charlie lifting his right hand before each stroke. Only, here he hits the hi-hat and the snare at the same time. This evolved into not hitting the hi-hat at the fourth. He indeed seems to do this subconsiencely -sometimes he hits the hihat at the fourth, sometimes he doesn't.
I wonder what the first track is where he really doesn't hit the hi-hat at the 4 no more. It must be something like Bitch.
Mathijs