For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
35love
Only partway thru reading (shouldn't have skipped ahead to see verdict!)
But just wanted to say:
Great writing roller99
Quote
mr_dja
Haven't followed the trial all that closely but would like to give a shout out to roller99 for a well written, entertaining article. Will you let us know here when you post "Part 2"?
Peace,
Mr DJA
Quote
Hairball
I was thinking that because the jury deliberated for 5 hours might be because not all of them are on the same page (no pun intended).
Perhaps there is a lone wolf Zep hater siding with the plaintiffs. On the other hand, possibly a single die-hard Zep freak holding out for the defense.
If there is a hung jury, what happens next? Possibly a retrial?
ps - nice article roller.
Quote
mr_djaQuote
DeanGoodmanQuote
hopkins
Also I wonder how much the legal fees were for both parties, and how in the world could Wolfe's estate afford this? Are both parties responsible for only their own legal fees and/or court costs?
At $900 an hour, it must be pushing a million when all expenses are tallied up. I assume Malofiy was working on spec in hopes of a career-saving win. If he knew in advance that the jury would never get to hear the Taurus sound recording, why did he proceed and why is he crying victim now?
The estate doesn't even own the copyright, so probably blew its annual income on parking fees at the courthouse.
Jimmy and Robert paid dearly, though these things are relative. Maybe Atlantic chipped in as the owner of the recordings? I believe in England that the losing party is often obliged to pay the victor's costs; but that does not happen here.
Does anyone remember reading somewhere that Malofiy is actually also the trustee of the estate? Somehow I thought I saw that somewhere.
Peace,
Mr DJA
RightQuote
HomerSimpson
Let's see how their iTunes sales are next week. How much publicity are they getting out of this - particularly having won the lawsuit? Led Zeppelin, Robert Plant - Jimmy Page - their name is all over the news and has been all week - TV, radio, internet - And no publicity is bad publicity, right?
Quote
stanloveQuote
onestep
Good .... Zeppelin created a great song that is played all over the world for decades, and they shouldn't have to share their composition with the estate of someone who has passed on, and never thought to bring suit against them in the first place.
What does any of this have to do with anything. And he did talk about suing them.
If they stole it they should have lost, if they didn't they should win. Its really simple.
Quote
onestepQuote
stanloveQuote
onestep
Good .... Zeppelin created a great song that is played all over the world for decades, and they shouldn't have to share their composition with the estate of someone who has passed on, and never thought to bring suit against them in the first place.
What does any of this have to do with anything. And he did talk about suing them.
If they stole it they should have lost, if they didn't they should win. Its really simple.
The jury finds they didn't steal it, so they won...what logic the jury used to make that decision is not known at this time. I am pleased with the decision personally for the reasons stated above....if you don't agree with my reasoning, that's fine with me. I prefer to believe in the mystery of music and the blues roots of Led Zeppelin....so there...
If you would like to reply nah uh, I can reply uh uh all day long...which is sort of how this expensive litigation went. So pick up you rattle and go home...wait did I get that last idea from an obscure band named Fleetwood Mac???
I realize Mr. Love that you are merely pointing out what the legal part of the argument should be...but I truly feel that the entire case was a waste of time and money...that there are plenty of songs with similar chording that could merit such a suit and tie up courts forever. I think there should be a law against frivolous trials brought against defendants. If a lawyer or law group that files a suit, and if that said suit found to be frivolous, then that legal group, or lawyer should have severe sanctions, including losing the license to practice for a period of time...using language or action ambiguity to harm innocent parties should be criminal, especially if found by jury that someone didn't do what is charged. Some lawyers and legals mine society to steal cash from defendants. I guess that is why there are so many negative lawyer jokes.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH LAWYER JOKES?
LAWYERS DON'T THINK THEY ARE FUNNY, AND PEOPLE DON'T THINK THEY ARE JOKES.
Quote
Long John StonerQuote
mr_djaQuote
DeanGoodmanQuote
hopkins
Also I wonder how much the legal fees were for both parties, and how in the world could Wolfe's estate afford this? Are both parties responsible for only their own legal fees and/or court costs?
At $900 an hour, it must be pushing a million when all expenses are tallied up. I assume Malofiy was working on spec in hopes of a career-saving win. If he knew in advance that the jury would never get to hear the Taurus sound recording, why did he proceed and why is he crying victim now?
The estate doesn't even own the copyright, so probably blew its annual income on parking fees at the courthouse.
Jimmy and Robert paid dearly, though these things are relative. Maybe Atlantic chipped in as the owner of the recordings? I believe in England that the losing party is often obliged to pay the victor's costs; but that does not happen here.
Does anyone remember reading somewhere that Malofiy is actually also the trustee of the estate? Somehow I thought I saw that somewhere.
Peace,
Mr DJA
He's not. He represents the trustee, Michael Skidmore.
Quote
onestepQuote
stanloveQuote
onestep
Good .... Zeppelin created a great song that is played all over the world for decades, and they shouldn't have to share their composition with the estate of someone who has passed on, and never thought to bring suit against them in the first place.
What does any of this have to do with anything. And he did talk about suing them.
If they stole it they should have lost, if they didn't they should win. Its really simple.
The jury finds they didn't steal it, so they won...what logic the jury used to make that decision is not known at this time. I am pleased with the decision personally for the reasons stated above....if you don't agree with my reasoning, that's fine with me. I prefer to believe in the mystery of music and the blues roots of Led Zeppelin....so there...
If you would like to reply nah uh, I can reply uh uh all day long...which is sort of how this expensive litigation went. So pick up you rattle and go home...wait did I get that last idea from an obscure band named Fleetwood Mac???
I realize Mr. Love that you are merely pointing out what the legal part of the argument should be...but I truly feel that the entire case was a waste of time and money...that there are plenty of songs with similar chording that could merit such a suit and tie up courts forever. I think there should be a law against frivolous trials brought against defendants. If a lawyer or law group that files a suit, and if that said suit found to be frivolous, then that legal group, or lawyer should have severe sanctions, including losing the license to practice for a period of time...using language or action ambiguity to harm innocent parties should be criminal, especially if found by jury that someone didn't do what is charged. Some lawyers and legals mine society to steal cash from defendants. I guess that is why there are so many negative lawyer jokes.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH LAWYER JOKES?
LAWYERS DON'T THINK THEY ARE FUNNY, AND PEOPLE DON'T THINK THEY ARE JOKES.
YupQuote
wonderboy
Maybe the estate of some 10th Century English poet could sue Plant for stealing the lyrical ideas.
Quote
stanlove
So there you have it. You don't think they stole it. Thats all that needs to be said or makes sense.
Wjat does your previous post of they created a song that is played all over thw world have to do with anything? Nothing. Thats my point. Unless you are making the case that if you are a successful and popular musician then you can take and steal anything you want.
Quote
roller99Quote
onestepQuote
stanloveQuote
onestep
Good .... Zeppelin created a great song that is played all over the world for decades, and they shouldn't have to share their composition with the estate of someone who has passed on, and never thought to bring suit against them in the first place.
What does any of this have to do with anything. And he did talk about suing them.
If they stole it they should have lost, if they didn't they should win. Its really simple.
The jury finds they didn't steal it, so they won...what logic the jury used to make that decision is not known at this time. I am pleased with the decision personally for the reasons stated above....if you don't agree with my reasoning, that's fine with me. I prefer to believe in the mystery of music and the blues roots of Led Zeppelin....so there...
If you would like to reply nah uh, I can reply uh uh all day long...which is sort of how this expensive litigation went. So pick up you rattle and go home...wait did I get that last idea from an obscure band named Fleetwood Mac???
I realize Mr. Love that you are merely pointing out what the legal part of the argument should be...but I truly feel that the entire case was a waste of time and money...that there are plenty of songs with similar chording that could merit such a suit and tie up courts forever. I think there should be a law against frivolous trials brought against defendants. If a lawyer or law group that files a suit, and if that said suit found to be frivolous, then that legal group, or lawyer should have severe sanctions, including losing the license to practice for a period of time...using language or action ambiguity to harm innocent parties should be criminal, especially if found by jury that someone didn't do what is charged. Some lawyers and legals mine society to steal cash from defendants. I guess that is why there are so many negative lawyer jokes.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH LAWYER JOKES?
LAWYERS DON'T THINK THEY ARE FUNNY, AND PEOPLE DON'T THINK THEY ARE JOKES.
I tried to take a picture of Malofiy when I was down there, but my camera recoiled in terror.
Quote
RollingFreak
I agree that Zep's assertions they barely knew who Spirit were was ridiculous. Not saying you gotta remember everyone that opened for you, but you're in the music business at that time. If Spirit has a fanbase, you know who Spirit is.
I also agree 12 Dreams Of Dr. Sardonicis is an incredible album. Maybe not better than my favorite Zep album, but Zep also never made something quite as masterful as 12 Dreams.
I don't believe Zep suck (I think they're great just too overplayed and forced down people's throats) and I don't believe Spirit deserved to win this case. But that was a dumb statement on Zep's part during the trial and if they were in any possible way being serious, they should go out and buy themselves 12 Dreams.
Quote
JohnnyBGoode
Has anyone heard Train's cover album of Led Zeppelin II? Train is one of my guilty pleasures, haven't heard the album yet.
Quote
jambay
I would bet money right now that this is already a done deal. I would bet that rigged judge is going to rule the song was rip off and Page/Plant will have to pay 100 Million++ and eventually the judge will get his cut of the lawsuit money in a paper bag... probably 5-10 Million... and that will be BS.
.
Poor stanley, always crying out for attention.Quote
stanloveQuote
jambay
I would bet money right now that this is already a done deal. I would bet that rigged judge is going to rule the song was rip off and Page/Plant will have to pay 100 Million++ and eventually the judge will get his cut of the lawsuit money in a paper bag... probably 5-10 Million... and that will be BS.
.
Talk about a breakroom loudmouth moment.