Tell Me :
Talk
I wish they would kiss already and get it over with.
LMAO!
See what I mean about taylorites?
He was essential until the end, although not as much as some make him out to be. His early chops on slide and his innate feeling for the blues gave them credibility. Yes, he became a pop star, but his look and attitude defined the group. Brian was elegantly wasted years before Keith appropriated it. And his style was sharp as a tack long before that became Mick's job. And although his rhythm playing isn't noted much, his choppy chunks on songs like Off The Hook really set the template for the band.
As long as he was being a pop star, he did add musical flourishes to their pop sound that lifted them to a whole other level. Mick & Keith wrote the compositions, but Brian's recorder, sitar, vibraphones, mellotron, are the musical highlights of those songs.
Brian was a little genius. He was ahead of the crowd. But his own ego and insecurities kept him from developing his talents. Yes, he was barely there for Beggars and Let It Bleed, but it's his dark spirit coursing through the Stones music to begin with. And I don't give Keith the final word on Brian. Anita should be the one to curse his name, but she doesn't. Keith appears to have some unfinished business with Brian that we will never know about.
Brian's actual contribution as a musical member of the group faded rather quickly, but he's there in the foundation of the sound, the look, everything. He is the original Rolling Stone.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-08-28 23:01 by 24FPS.
More Hot Rocks might be there, perhaps? ><
They are indeed bad too, but in comparison with Brian Jones purists they are just blond angels.
And he was of course not a vital contributor to two of the albums you have praised before: Satanic and Buttons
PS: As a joke this is quite good, kleerie
I have to admit he was fabulous on those albums, and also on Aftermath, all three belonging to my favourite Stones albums.
It seems you have missed the last Rolling Stones tour.
I and many others are now masturbating on this recent one (btw: it gets about 2000 views a day and has reached the third place of all my 165 vids within a shorter period than 2 months, so there are a lot of masturbators-to-Taylor-guitar solos amongst us. It has also got by far the most likes and reactions, by far most of all positive. Just some BJ purists and very probably more woodpeckers being naysayers:
Brian was a genius with a small g. It also depends on what someone has to achieve to be a genius in your book. The Stones are geniuses in getting me to continue to shell out money to them voluntarily for product year after year. I don't have to do it, and yet I do have to do it. Genius.
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
Bellajane
()
Date: August 26, 2013 20:31
Maybe I haven't been paying close attention, but what are the fans of the other Rolling Stones called? I kinda know what I'd call Ron Wood's fans, but I won't be naughty
. I thought about calling Bill Wyman's fans, Wymanizers, just one letter different than his apparent favorite past-time back in the good old days. How about the others?
. I thought about calling Bill Wyman's fans, Wymanizers, just one letter different than his apparent favorite past-time back in the good old days. How about the others?Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
duke richardson
()
Date: August 26, 2013 20:47
Keitharian
Wattsionado
Wymanizer--can't do better.
Stuist
Mickster..
Wattsionado
Wymanizer--can't do better.
Stuist
Mickster..
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
NoCode0680
()
Date: August 26, 2013 21:38
Keith - Keef-a-maniacs
Mick - Jagg-offs
Bill - Wynos
Wood - Lumberjacks
Charlie - Charlie Watts Fans (Charlie isn't interested in this shit)
Mick - Jagg-offs
Bill - Wynos
Wood - Lumberjacks
Charlie - Charlie Watts Fans (Charlie isn't interested in this shit)
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
Come On
()
Date: August 26, 2013 21:56
Brian Jones Purist - Taylorian and Woodypecker here....
2 1 2 0
2 1 2 0
I LOVE THE ROLLING STONES
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: August 26, 2013 22:32
Rolling Stones Fans
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
-------------------
Keep On Rolling
Re: I LOVE THE ROLLING STONES
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: August 26, 2013 23:28
Quote
Rolling Hansie
Rolling Stones Fans
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: August 28, 2013 17:12
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
NoCode0680
()
Date: August 28, 2013 17:14
Quote
DandelionPowderman
I wish they would kiss already and get it over with.
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: August 28, 2013 17:20
A good shoulder-squeeze ain't too bad, though 
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
Wroclaw
()
Date: August 28, 2013 17:25
don'thavealife'rs might be a good name for the more extreme fraction ....
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
Shantipole
()
Date: August 28, 2013 20:01
Quote
NoCode0680
Keith - Keef-a-maniacs
Mick - Jagg-offs
Bill - Wynos
Wood - Lumberjacks
Charlie - Charlie Watts Fans (Charlie isn't interested in this shit)
LMAO!
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
Bellajane
()
Date: August 28, 2013 21:15
Okay, I thought of two more:
Keefers - Keith Richards
Jaggernauts - Mick Jagger
Keefers - Keith Richards
Jaggernauts - Mick Jagger
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: August 28, 2013 21:19
Taylorites need a special silly name because, generally speaking, it seems they tend to be more a fan of Taylor than The Rolling Stones. 
In saying that there is a number of Jones freaks that seem to despise Mick and Keith, but they are just idiots.
Is there such a thing as just a fan of the Ronnie Wood line up?
In saying that there is a number of Jones freaks that seem to despise Mick and Keith, but they are just idiots.
Is there such a thing as just a fan of the Ronnie Wood line up?
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
Bellajane
()
Date: August 28, 2013 21:27
As was mentioned before, maybe we should just call ourselves Rolling Stones Fans and stop this madness at once!
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
Ket
()
Date: August 28, 2013 21:51
I'm a
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
Bellajane
()
Date: August 28, 2013 21:57
Yes this is a "Woody"..perfect for Ronnie Wood's fans. Was thinking about that before!
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
kleermaker
()
Date: August 28, 2013 21:58
The worst are of course the Brian Jones purists who pretend that Brian Jones was an essential member of the band although he couldn't write a note and was almost invisible (inaudible) on the last two albums, despite his nice slide on No Expectations. They are in denial that he was first and for all a popstar and just wanted to be that (see Keith's interview elsewhere). Now he is first and for all a cult figure and his followers in fact sectarians, living in a far away past.
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
Elmo Lewis
()
Date: August 28, 2013 22:00
Keith: Ric-hards
Ronnie: Wood-peckers
Ronnie: Wood-peckers
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
Bellajane
()
Date: August 28, 2013 22:00
It was sad seeing him in Crossfire Hurricane before he died. He was so wasted..truly a shame.
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: August 28, 2013 22:19
Quote
kleermaker
The worst are of course the Brian Jones purists who pretend that Brian Jones was an essential member of the band although he couldn't write a note and was almost invisible (inaudible) on the last two albums, despite his nice slide on No Expectations. They are in denial that he was first and for all a popstar and just wanted to be that (see Keith's interview elsewhere). Now he is first and for all a cult figure and his followers in fact sectarians, living in a far away past.
See what I mean about taylorites?
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
24FPS
()
Date: August 28, 2013 22:20
Quote
kleermaker
The worst are of course the Brian Jones purists who pretend that Brian Jones was an essential member of the band although he couldn't write a note and was almost invisible (inaudible) on the last two albums, despite his nice slide on No Expectations. They are in denial that he was first and for all a popstar and just wanted to be that (see Keith's interview elsewhere). Now he is first and for all a cult figure and his followers in fact sectarians, living in a far away past.
He was essential until the end, although not as much as some make him out to be. His early chops on slide and his innate feeling for the blues gave them credibility. Yes, he became a pop star, but his look and attitude defined the group. Brian was elegantly wasted years before Keith appropriated it. And his style was sharp as a tack long before that became Mick's job. And although his rhythm playing isn't noted much, his choppy chunks on songs like Off The Hook really set the template for the band.
As long as he was being a pop star, he did add musical flourishes to their pop sound that lifted them to a whole other level. Mick & Keith wrote the compositions, but Brian's recorder, sitar, vibraphones, mellotron, are the musical highlights of those songs.
Brian was a little genius. He was ahead of the crowd. But his own ego and insecurities kept him from developing his talents. Yes, he was barely there for Beggars and Let It Bleed, but it's his dark spirit coursing through the Stones music to begin with. And I don't give Keith the final word on Brian. Anita should be the one to curse his name, but she doesn't. Keith appears to have some unfinished business with Brian that we will never know about.
Brian's actual contribution as a musical member of the group faded rather quickly, but he's there in the foundation of the sound, the look, everything. He is the original Rolling Stone.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-08-28 23:01 by 24FPS.
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: August 28, 2013 22:23
Quote
His Majesty
Taylorites need a special silly name because, generally speaking, it seems they tend to be more a fan of Taylor than The Rolling Stones.
In saying that there is a number of Jones freaks that seem to despise Mick and Keith, but they are just idiots.
Is there such a thing as just a fan of the Ronnie Wood line up?
More Hot Rocks might be there, perhaps? >
<Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
kleermaker
()
Date: August 28, 2013 22:25
Quote
His MajestyQuote
kleermaker
The worst are of course the Brian Jones purists who pretend that Brian Jones was an essential member of the band although he couldn't write a note and was almost invisible (inaudible) on the last two albums, despite his nice slide on No Expectations. They are in denial that he was first and for all a popstar and just wanted to be that (see Keith's interview elsewhere). Now he is first and for all a cult figure and his followers in fact sectarians, living in a far away past.
See what I mean about taylorites?
They are indeed bad too, but in comparison with Brian Jones purists they are just blond angels.
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: August 28, 2013 22:27
Quote
kleermaker
The worst are of course the Brian Jones purists who pretend that Brian Jones was an essential member of the band although he couldn't write a note and was almost invisible (inaudible) on the last two albums, despite his nice slide on No Expectations. They are in denial that he was first and for all a popstar and just wanted to be that (see Keith's interview elsewhere). Now he is first and for all a cult figure and his followers in fact sectarians, living in a far away past.
And he was of course not a vital contributor to two of the albums you have praised before: Satanic and Buttons
PS: As a joke this is quite good, kleerie
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
kleermaker
()
Date: August 28, 2013 22:36
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
kleermaker
The worst are of course the Brian Jones purists who pretend that Brian Jones was an essential member of the band although he couldn't write a note and was almost invisible (inaudible) on the last two albums, despite his nice slide on No Expectations. They are in denial that he was first and for all a popstar and just wanted to be that (see Keith's interview elsewhere). Now he is first and for all a cult figure and his followers in fact sectarians, living in a far away past.
And he was of course not a vital contributor to two of the albums you have praised before: Satanic and Buttons
PS: As a joke this is quite good, kleerie
I have to admit he was fabulous on those albums, and also on Aftermath, all three belonging to my favourite Stones albums.
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: August 28, 2013 22:36
It's silly to say Jones was a genius, not many people truly are, certainly none of The Rolling Stones.
For better or worse, he was quite unique though and an essential member indeed. Inaudible on Beggars Banquet? Only to the clueless.
Most likley of no use to anyone including himself during the last year of his life though.
Ps:
Someone who masterbates to guitar solos recorded in 1969 - 1973 saying other people are stuck in the distant past is quite funny. ><
For better or worse, he was quite unique though and an essential member indeed. Inaudible on Beggars Banquet? Only to the clueless.
Most likley of no use to anyone including himself during the last year of his life though.
Ps:
Someone who masterbates to guitar solos recorded in 1969 - 1973 saying other people are stuck in the distant past is quite funny. >
<Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
kleermaker
()
Date: August 28, 2013 22:49
Quote
His Majesty
Ps:
Someone who masterbates to guitar solos recorded in 1969 - 1973 saying other people are stuck in the distant past is quite funny. >
It seems you have missed the last Rolling Stones tour.
I and many others are now masturbating on this recent one (btw: it gets about 2000 views a day and has reached the third place of all my 165 vids within a shorter period than 2 months, so there are a lot of masturbators-to-Taylor-guitar solos amongst us. It has also got by far the most likes and reactions, by far most of all positive. Just some BJ purists and very probably more woodpeckers being naysayers:
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: August 28, 2013 22:58
You continue to masterbate to guitar solo's from 1969 - 1973.
widdle widdle.
If popularity is a good gauge of quality, go eat the Some Girls sales stats. ><
widdle widdle.
If popularity is a good gauge of quality, go eat the Some Girls sales stats. >
<Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
24FPS
()
Date: August 28, 2013 23:04
Quote
His Majesty
It's silly to say Jones was a genius, not many people truly are, certainly none of The Rolling Stones.
Brian was a genius with a small g. It also depends on what someone has to achieve to be a genius in your book. The Stones are geniuses in getting me to continue to shell out money to them voluntarily for product year after year. I don't have to do it, and yet I do have to do it. Genius.
Re: Taylorites/Taylorians, Brian Jones Purists....
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: August 28, 2013 23:05
Quote
24FPS
Brian was a genius with a small g. It also depends on what someone has to achieve to be a genius in your book. The Stones are geniuses in getting me to continue to shell out money to them voluntarily for product year after year. I don't have to do it, and yet I do have to do it. Genius.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
Guests:
1889
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10