Tell Me : Talk

Talk about your favorite band.

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto: Forum List•Message List•New Topic•Search•Log In•***Print View

new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: kish_stoned ()

Date: November 21, 2012 19:25

Fun time for fans,all this doom and gloom news re sky high price of tickets.
What title should have been for GRRR cd?
I would have called it
STONED & STILL ROCKING (GREATEST 50 TRACKS)
with nice photos of the band with B.JONES/MICK TAYLOR.RONNIE WOOD.
After all its only rock-roll but we like it

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: Chris Fountain ()

Date: November 21, 2012 19:27

"You will Go Ape Shit over their Greatest 50 Hits!

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: windmelody ()

Date: November 21, 2012 19:29

It should have been called: "Let's rock! The Rolling Stones on their way to Molvania"

[image.checkfelix.com]

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-11-21 19:32 by windmelody.

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: SomeTorontoGirl ()

Date: November 21, 2012 19:42

It should have been called almost anything else. TV ads saying "This program has been brought to you by Grrr!" and radio station announcements that they will be featuring Grrr! sound absolutely embarrassed. And for good reason. What a stupid #$%@ name!

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: BustedButton ()

Date: November 21, 2012 20:04

It should have ben called, Lord of the Strings.... and had that Ugly, weird, Elf looking picture of Keith on the cover!

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()

Date: November 21, 2012 20:13

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: Chris Fountain ()

Date: November 21, 2012 21:05

Quote
Max'sKansasCity
L

Grrr- coud've featured an alligator! They Grrr but it it would have been A-ok to see crodile tears

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: Naturalust ()

Date: November 21, 2012 21:27

Exile Down Wall Street, Bohemia Lost, Mom and Dad's Greatest Hits, Fifty Licks, etc etc

Most anything would have been better than GRRR, it seems a ploy to get kids who haven't been along for the ride interested. peace

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: andrewt ()

Date: November 21, 2012 22:04

Through The Past, Redundantly.

Hot Rocks 4: The Rockening

Sucking In Your Dollars

Big Hits & One More Shot.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-11-21 22:06 by andrewt.

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: GravityBoy ()

Date: November 21, 2012 22:05

"F*ck off".

Would have been perfect.

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: Rockman ()

Date: November 21, 2012 22:05

(GREATEST 50 TRACKS) .... wow!! that's original

ROCKMAN

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: qz093n ()

Date: November 22, 2012 00:49

Grrrecian Formula

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: jamesfdouglas ()

Date: November 22, 2012 00:59

Sucking In The Whateverthisdecadeiscalled

[thepowergoats.com]

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: stonesnow ()

Date: November 22, 2012 01:00

Quote
jamesfdouglas
Sucking In The Whateverthisdecadeiscalled

Sucking In Their Seventies?

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: qz093n ()

Date: November 22, 2012 01:11

We have a winner!

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: JumpinJackOLantern ()

Date: November 22, 2012 02:37

How about "Mighty Stones Still Rollin 50"?

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: spsimmons ()

Date: November 22, 2012 05:41

Quote
stonesnow
Sucking In Their Seventies?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Although I don't agree.

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: Hound Dog ()

Date: November 22, 2012 05:48

I saw this in the store today and looked at the track list and still can't believe that songs like Fool To Cry and Don't Stop are on here, yet Mother's Little Helper and Midnight Rambler aren't.

For a casual classic rock fan that buys the 2 cd version, that sucks.

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: treaclefingers ()

Date: November 22, 2012 05:55

Quote
Hound Dog
I saw this in the store today and looked at the track list and still can't believe that songs like Fool To Cry and Don't Stop are on here, yet Mother's Little Helper and Midnight Rambler aren't.

For a casual classic rock fan that buys the 2 cd version, that sucks.

I have no sympathy for the casual classic rock fan. If they don't have their heart in it, then they deserve to miss the true classics.

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: riverrat ()

Date: November 22, 2012 07:43

GRRRisly (just kidding)

Yes, STG--I agree. "GRRR" sounds so ridiculous in interviews...wth
Wonder who was behind that.

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message

Re: new title for grrr should have been

Posted by: Virgin Priest ()

Date: November 22, 2012 09:12

Waiting On A Nurse

Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message