Feel on.....12" single style



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2011-09-15 02:04 by EddieByword.

Send It To Me

the shoot 'em dead, brainbell jangler!

Too Rude

Send it to me or luxury!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Luxury"

The under assistant 2120 west coast avenue satisfaction

2 1 2 0

You don't have to mean it.

[www.reverbnation.com]

Marley's "One Love".
It also has a special meaning for Keith, who signs letters and faxes with: One Love, Keith Richards"
It's a lovely tune!
But it would also be a good idea to do "Walk - And Don't Look Back". Bernard and Blonz could fill in for Tosh and it could be a magical moment, I believe.

They did Walk And Don't Look Back in 2002. It was a trainwreck then, and they did the soul version. But it's a great song, and maybe they should dust it off and try it again?

Personally, I'd like to have Feel On Baby.

Quote
DandelionPowderman
They did Walk And Don't Look Back in 2002. It was a trainwreck then, and they did the soul version. But it's a great song, and maybe they should dust it off and try it again?

Personally, I'd like to have Feel On Baby.

It's a reggae tune - so they shouldn't have done the soul version. I think they can pull it off nicely now.

No, it was written as a soul tune, and always performed as such: Paul Williams' solo spot in the Temps shows. Tosh and Jagger chose to cut a reggae-fied version of it.

1.Luxury
2. Send It To Me

In the Keith set:
1. The Harder They Come
2. Pressure Drop

Quote
Addicted

Quote
DandelionPowderman
They did Walk And Don't Look Back in 2002. It was a trainwreck then, and they did the soul version. But it's a great song, and maybe they should dust it off and try it again?

Personally, I'd like to have Feel On Baby.

It's a reggae tune - so they shouldn't have done the soul version. I think they can pull it off nicely now.

Originally a Smokey Robinson-tune, no? But I like the Tosh/Jagger version the most.

Send it to me or Luxury

Too rude.

You Don't Have To Mean It

chery oh baby

You Dont Have To Mean It

None, since the Stones don't do reggae and what they have done that is called reggae is horrendous.

What's horrendous about Feel On Baby?

Quote
skipstone
None, since the Stones don't do reggae and what they have done that is called reggae is horrendous.

Check out Lee Perry's Superape...check out the Stones Feel on..everythings there,..the Stones nailed it with that one (esp. the 12" mix) (IMO)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2011-07-03 16:17 by EddieByword.

It's not reggae. Not sure what's so difficult to understand about that.

Quote
skipstone
It's not reggae. Not sure what's so difficult to understand about that.

As I said check out Lee Perry's Superape there's not much difference in the ambience so I guess he's not reggae either....nor Sly & Robbie who helped them put it togethor ?? Your opinion is not difficult to understand in terms it is written in English and I can read it....but that doesn't automatically make you right

Dude, even the Stones know it's not reggae. There's a big difference. Just because Sly and Robbie played on it does not make it reggae. The Stones' cover of Cherry Oh Baby is as close to reggae as they've gotten or ever will and even that is horrible.

Maybe if you had worded it "reggae-esque" then it would make more sense. It's the same as saying "Most desired classical song in a Stones show" and putting in Moonlight Mile because it has strings.

Dude, even the Stones know it's not reggae - How do you know this ? Agree with you on Cherry oh Baby being horrible though - about the other, I mean if you want to publish an exact description of what defines a reggae song which can inform us mere mortals then I guess we'll keep hearing what we hear and recognise it as reggae (albeit white)



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2011-07-03 16:19 by EddieByword.

No. I don't want to. I don't have time for a mere mortal like you with your "reggae" medleys and watermelon milkshakes...

How do I know that? Because I read it. In a book or a magazine. All you need to do is read. Lots of things. And here's one for you - it's not on the intranets. Just accept it - the Stones are (were) a pretty good white blues band at one point. Reggae - no.

If you can't tell the difference by listening to actual reggae music than there is no use in telling you anyway. I guess you're stuck on Stones or some silly thing like that in a Monopoly game or whatever it is.

At least you admit Cherry Oh Baby is awful bad!

Quote
skipstone
No. I don't want to. I don't have time for a mere mortal like you with your "reggae" medleys and watermelon milkshakes...

How do I know that? Because I read it. In a book or a magazine. All you need to do is read. Lots of things. And here's one for you - it's not on the intranets. Just accept it - the Stones are (were) a pretty good white blues band at one point. Reggae - no.

If you can't tell the difference by listening to actual reggae music than there is no use in telling you anyway. I guess you're stuck on Stones or some silly thing like that in a Monopoly game or whatever it is.

At least you admit Cherry Oh Baby is awful bad!

Cop out, and a bad tempered big headed one at that



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2010-11-17 18:14 by EddieByword.

No. Not a cop out. You're just not willing to accept the truth is all.

It really doesn't matter anyway. It means nothing.

I agree with that -----It really doesn't matter anyway. It means nothing ------

If i'm wrong I expect I'll go to hell.....

You know what Bon Scott sang about hell ha ha. It's got to be better than the cold.

Well, but really - to answer your question, does anyone REALLY want to hear the Stones do THEIR reggae songs live? HA HA - I, for one, do not!