For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
GazzaQuote
Justin
I'm late to the party but why then is an IORR outtake being released under GHS?
Par for the course with these deluxe reissues. Its actually a Black and Blue era outtake! The IORR album was finished well before this session - the album actually came put two weeks after it
Quote
Chris Fountain
Scarlet will be the most popular name choice for babies and pets!!
Quote
Erik_Snow
A near 80 year old who has the ability to sing as he did when he was 31....
Quote
Erik_Snow
Mick Jagger is more than extraordinary, here are 1000s of posters with great insight in their music and recordings, yet nobody can tell for sure if the vocals for Scarlet was recorded last month or 47 years ago, or somewhere in-between. A near 80 year old who has the ability to sing as he did when he was 31....that's out of line
Quote
Erik_Snow
Mick Jagger is more than extraordinary, here are 1000s of posters with great insight in their music and recordings, yet nobody can tell for sure if the vocals for Scarlet was recorded last month or 47 years ago, or somewhere in-between. A near 80 year old who has the ability to sing as he did when he was 31....that's out of line
Quote
DoxaQuote
Erik_Snow
Mick Jagger is more than extraordinary, here are 1000s of posters with great insight in their music and recordings, yet nobody can tell for sure if the vocals for Scarlet was recorded last month or 47 years ago, or somewhere in-between. A near 80 year old who has the ability to sing as he did when he was 31....that's out of line
Haha, I've been laughing that myself too - I could give some sort of arguments for each of the suggestions. The incoherent, half-baked lyrics might suggest that it's not done recently, but some other circumential evidence - such as knowing he has doing something for these songs, and Page's hint of him having done a great job, and what we know of the song's history - say something different. But the truth is that my ears just don't give any firm answer. I lean on the suggestion - earwise - that Mick vocals are more or less all done recently, and all there is 'original' are Keith's background vocals - which probably have served as a guide for Mick to construct the main vocals - and lyrics - over them.
But that this is not 'obvious' at all, as it supposedly should be, that's just amazing.
Seemingly Mick is not this time saying anything about it.... Who knows if his story to claim he was there in the original sessions is just to serve the illusion his vocals dating from 1974...
- Doxa
Quote
DoxaQuote
Erik_Snow
Mick Jagger is more than extraordinary, here are 1000s of posters with great insight in their music and recordings, yet nobody can tell for sure if the vocals for Scarlet was recorded last month or 47 years ago, or somewhere in-between. A near 80 year old who has the ability to sing as he did when he was 31....that's out of line
Haha, I've been laughing that myself too - I could give some sort of arguments for each of the suggestions. The incoherent, half-baked lyrics might suggest that it's not done recently, but some other circumential evidence - such as knowing he has done something for these songs, and Page's hint of him having done a great job, and what we know of the song's history - say something different. But the truth is that my ears just don't give any firm answer. I lean on the suggestion - earwise - that Mick vocals are more or less all done recently, and all there is 'original' are Keith's background vocals - which probably have served as a guide for Mick to construct the main vocals - and lyrics - over them.
But that this is not 'obvious' at all, as it supposedly should be, that's just amazing.
Seemingly Mick is not this time saying anything about it.... Who knows if his story to claim he was there in the original sessions is just to serve the illusion his vocals dating from 1974...
- Doxa
Quote
Maindefender
The background vocals are attributed to bassist Rick Grech
Quote
DoxaQuote
Maindefender
The background vocals are attributed to bassist Rick Grech
Are they? Damn, I hear Keef there, but seemingly I really can't trust my ears any longer at all...
- Doxa
Quote
Doxa
Actually I was already amazed with "Criss Cross" - that of 'old' Mick dueting with 'young' Mick, and the biggest evidence for seperating the two came from knowing the old out-takes not having certain passages at all...
- Doxa
Quote
JordyLicks96
Well we know for sure he recently added an acoustic guitar and maracas to the song but the fact the vocals are so hard to tell if they're from '74 or now is simply put amazing. Mick Jagger honestly keeps getting better with age. Can't believe he'll be 77 in 3 days!!
Quote
Erik_Snow
And how anything can soundlike 70s Clapton and 90s Aerosmith at the same time beats me[/b]
Quote
DoxaQuote
Erik_Snow
Mick Jagger is more than extraordinary, here are 1000s of posters with great insight in their music and recordings, yet nobody can tell for sure if the vocals for Scarlet was recorded last month or 47 years ago, or somewhere in-between. A near 80 year old who has the ability to sing as he did when he was 31....that's out of line
Haha, I've been laughing that myself too - I could give some sort of arguments for each of the suggestions. The incoherent, half-baked lyrics might suggest that it's not done recently, but some other circumential evidence - such as knowing he has done something for these songs, and Page's hint of him having done a great job, and what we know of the song's history - say something different. But the truth is that my ears just don't give any firm answer. I lean on the suggestion - earwise - that Mick vocals are more or less all done recently, and all there is 'original' are Keith's background vocals - which probably have served as a guide for Mick to construct the main vocals - and lyrics - over them.
But that this is not 'obvious' at all, as it supposedly should be, that's just amazing.
Seemingly Mick is not this time saying anything about it.... Who knows if his story to claim he was there in the original sessions is just to serve the illusion his vocals dating from 1974...
- Doxa
Quote
DoxaQuote
Erik_Snow
Mick Jagger is more than extraordinary, here are 1000s of posters with great insight in their music and recordings, yet nobody can tell for sure if the vocals for Scarlet was recorded last month or 47 years ago, or somewhere in-between. A near 80 year old who has the ability to sing as he did when he was 31....that's out of line
Haha, I've been laughing that myself too - I could give some sort of arguments for each of the suggestions. The incoherent, half-baked lyrics might suggest that it's not done recently, but some other circumential evidence - such as knowing he has done something for these songs, and Page's hint of him having done a great job, and what we know of the song's history - say something different. But the truth is that my ears just don't give any firm answer. I lean on the suggestion - earwise - that Mick vocals are more or less all done recently, and all there is 'original' are Keith's background vocals - which probably have served as a guide for Mick to construct the main vocals - and lyrics - over them.
But that this is not 'obvious' at all, as it supposedly should be, that's just amazing.
Seemingly Mick is not this time saying anything about it.... Who knows if his story to claim he was there in the original sessions is just to serve the illusion his vocals dating from 1974...
- Doxa