While driving to work this morning, I was flipping through the channels and caught a short interview with Ronnie on a local radio station ( [www.96rockonline.com] ). Alledgedly to promote his book, but most question were about the Stones. Dumb question of the day: "how does it feel now to be the most attractive person in the Stones" ?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-10-31 19:32 by Koen.

smile: and Ronnie's reply was ... ? :E

he laughed.

did he mention why he cancelled om Letterman?

Koen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> While driving to work this morning, I was flipping
> through the channels and caught a short interview
> with Ronnie on a local radio station (
> [www.96rockonline.com] ). Alledgedly to
> promote his book, but most question were about the
> Stones. Dumb question of the day: "how does it
> feel now to be the most attractive person in the
> Stones" ?

Thats a bit like being the tallest of the Seven Dwarves.....

ahem, Gazza honey: you are not especially well qualified to be assessing the attractiveness of males, right?
the Rolling Stones are hot - any other view is summarily dismissed due to a lack of evidence.
you can feel free to carry on with your assessments of dwarf-height, however. :E

with sssoul Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ahem, Gazza honey: you are not especially well
> qualified to be assessing the attractiveness of
> males, right?

I could be gay for all you know... *



> the Rolling Stones are hot - any other view is
> summarily dismissed due to a lack of evidence.
> you can feel free to carry on with your
> assessments of dwarf-height, however. :E

as I'm an absolutely towering 5'6, I'll gladly do so!
































* although I'm not.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-10-31 21:30 by Gazza.

>> for all you know <<

Gazza what do you freakin mean "for all *i* know"?!
edit: ... dignity & restraint strike again!
suffice to say: i am cognizant of the limits of your expertise in this respect :E



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-10-31 21:44 by with sssoul.

i think ronnie has aged well but he's not the most attractive...

My classmate saw him on Top Gear and went running
to me asking "is he really 60??" -
He looks great and to me he is the most attractive stone.
*dreamy eyes*

ooopsss...i should've known, adi!

the reason i said that is because "back in the day", i didn't care for ronnie's style, including his hair. i always thought he was trying to hard to have the prototypical "rock star". he's toned it down a little and like i said, he's aged well. he's certainly not unattractive. i just have a history of liking a couple of others a lot more...

yeah Val, i know, was just talking for myself
in the end, they all look great, and each one has their fave.

Ron's hair has looked pretty much the same since the mid-60s - cultivated his shag circa 1968 with fellow hair hall of famer Jeff Beck, but who else aside from bandmate Rod's rooster-style shag or Keith beginning in '68 - 69 had a similar hair style? These trendsetters really started it all, unless I'm forgetting somebody, and it became more commonplace around the mid 70s....

>> Keith beginning in ... <<

november 1966 - a beautifully historic moment in many ways :E


- november 1966 by Tom Keylock (courtesy of BrownEyedGirll)