Just a thought. I beleive at the end of this year Woody will be a Stone longer than Wyman. Each roughly about 31 to 32 each. Any thoughts?

Just that I will always consider Ronnie the new one.. Maybe it's a bit unfair towards him...

Who the f*ck is Mick Jagger?

Perhaps that will give him the favour of people forgetting that even he will turn 60 next year.

But has he scored the chicks Bill has?

Woah....that is an eye opener. No more new guy status...he's finally earned his full rank within the band. No one should ever debate it.

I doubt Wood could equal Wyman in his poontang quest....and I doubt he could remember either.

#......Go ahead....Bite the Big Apple....Don't mind the Maggots.....Uh Huh...#

Bill was an essential member of the golden era in terms of creativity and lived thru the stonemania years. Not Ron Wood. That's the gap.

Rubbish if ya ask me, that creativity talk, with all respect, Phd.
Bill also joined after the band was formed.
But it´s not necessary to compare - both geezers are
much more than allright...

Open point for discussion. Creativity is by essence a subjective point. The only answer could be provided by tonight event. We will be able to make a fair count. Separate tonight songs : those where Bill played and those where Ron played , let alone those where both played. If I am not wrong, Bill joined in 1963 and appear on the first single.

Bill joined in 62. Charlie was the last of the original Stones to join -
his first gig with them was january 63 (when Ronnie was what - 15 years old?).
Bill and Ronnie are both natural-born Rolling Stones - hail hail to them all.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2006-02-18 20:34 by with sssoul.

Ronnie has probably played to more fans than Bill (but less gigs).