Quote
skipstone
So you're taking jabs at Bono for making money but have nothing to say about Mick's worth? Isn't that...doesn't that seem odd somehow? Why do you think Bono makes all that money anyway?

So what if the tour is "extended". It's not actually. Just delayed. I'm guessing on a pretty good hunch that U2 will end up doing a good bit less amount of shows than the Stones did for the Bang tour, which went to some odd places and overplayed in some places because they simply wanted to make money (obviously). U2's greed is seemingly less so than the Stones' was for these compared tours. If U2 was to do the exact same amount of shows for the 360 tour, whether in 2 years or 3 years, how does that make it different? They'd certainly make a lot more just by volume - granted, if all the shows were sold out too - thant the Stones did. They got a bit more inovative with their stage. Maybe the Stones will do something similar and out gross U2 if they do indeed tour again.