Saw this pic on the news page here at IORR and reacted
on Mick's aging. It shows quite clear that he has aged
a lot the last year or so. Or what's your point on this.

[www.iorr.org]

Been Stoned since 1964 and still am!

Gracefully, I would say.

[www.reverbnation.com]

I'd say that is an older photo taken at a funeral perhaps...maybe his Mom or Dad's. Notice the way his hair is combed, not for the stage!! Not at all a representation of Mick on a daily basis.

Quote
mickschix
I'd say that is an older photo taken at a funeral perhaps...maybe his Mom or Dad's. Notice the way his hair is combed, not for the stage!! Not at all a representation of Mick on a daily basis.

It's a picture taken only a few days ago at the BAFTA awards.

Compared to mst 65 yearolds he looks quite young.

i think he aged a lot in recent years, say 5 years, not only last year.
but i think he also looks different not only older, maybe he has changed his diat or workout or something. 2006 i think he was the thinnest mick i´ve ever seen at a concert.

I hope I look that crappy, weigh that much and have as little hair as he does when I'm 65.....

Must be terrible!

We all get old.

But if you look at the vid of the Bafta event maybe you'll see how the still photo can make you look worse. On the threads about the Bafta presentation people were saying how fit and well Mick is looking. Check out the clips.

He looks great for a dude that age.

Thought Jagger looked very young and healthy at that movie-award. In fact he reminded me of the young Arnold Schwarzenegger at first sight

His hair reminded me of Tom Hanks' Dr. Robert Langdon from The Da Vinci Code.

Regardless, we love him just the same.

Aged but youthful...and that's not necessarily a contradiction...

You should see me just around midnight.....



ROCKMAN

Hi ya all!

Thanks for posting.
Just have to clarify my post.
I don't have any comments of his looks or anything like that.
To me he just looked much older all of a sudden.

No bashing from my side on Mick, just a reaction.

No matter what I also still love him just as much as the other boys in the band!

Been Stoned since 1964 and still am!

i tought he looked younger instead!

I see! Well, I guess it's the " Tom Hanks hair" that has altered his look a bit. Still, as Gazza said, we should look that good at 65. I think the black jacket and tie are a bit more severe than we're used to seeing Mick wear. Whoever said Tom Hanks Hair, very funny!!

.............BAFTA



ROCKMAN

Yeah, redundancy anyone?

P.S. Mick is STILL the sexiest man on the planet.....in my not so humble opinion.

......y'all must be looking at another picture..the make up artist did a great job hiding all the creases in his jowl.....not a bad photo of him..and the jacket he wore that night DB was very nice indeed.

Are you sure that isn't Bianca?

>:><

Quote
harlito1969
Are you sure that isn't Bianca?

if you had 300 million dollars at that age i guess you would probably look that good two---no sense in having all that dough and looking like @#$%--lol---he's had a lot of work done but why not?--you can't take it with you!!!

STONES JAM!! MICKEYS RULES!!! (burp) NADER IN 2016!!!!! GO GIANTS!!

Its hillarious how some people expect them to stay like its '72 forever! EVERYONE AGES DUMDUM!!!!!!!!!!!!

He looks fine to me, he's aging gracefully.

If the lighting was better he'd look even groovier.
I speak of back lighting, the saviour of many a Hollywood star.

It`s just an immediate feel thing because of the way he has combed his hair and the clothes he wears. If you analyze it, he doesn`t look any older.

I think he looks great for a man of 65 and in that pic in particular. The deep lines and wrinkles make him even more interesting looking. I know a lot of people in their early 40s who look like a piece of shit compared to Mick.

He's looking old on this picture because his hair are flat.
Otherwise, if you imagine this picture with a nicer hair (hey Mick, put some hair gel !!) he looks almost younger than I (and I am 44).

He's still Ok I think. Slim as usual.. an example to follow (at least on that point).